Patna High Court Quashes House-Trespass Case Born Of Ancestral Property Feud; FIR Vague, Delayed, Absurd

Justice Soni Shrivastava of the Patna High Court has quashed a Magistrate’s 2022 cognizance order and the entire prosecution of two members of the Jhunjhunwala family under Sections 448, 341, 323 and 506 of the IPC, holding that the FIR was vague, belated, attended with mala fide and lodged amid a dispute over ancestral property.

Someone Added A Fake ‘Interim Stay Granted’ Line To Its Own Order: Delhi High Court Flags A Fabricated Court Order And Directs An Investigation

The Delhi High Court has flagged a fabricated version of one of its own orders, in which an unknown person added a line reading ‘interim stay granted’ to a genuine order passed in a second appeal, and has directed that the matter be investigated. Hearing a petition over alleged property fraud, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav gave the petitioners liberty to approach the Registrar General and the Commissioner of Police, and directed the Commissioner to inquire and take action within two months.

Adoption of Niece’s Husband as “Ghardamad” Can’t Confer Property Rights Without Proof of Custom: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court ruled that an uncle-in-law cannot adopt his niece’s husband as a “ghardamad” for inheritance unless such a custom is legally proved. Setting aside three concurrent judgments, the Court held that the alleged Oraon tribal custom lacked sufficient evidence under customary law.

Relief to Senior Citizens: Tripura High Court Says They Can’t Be Penalised for Not Tracking Cases Online

The Tripura High Court held that senior citizens lacking technological proficiency cannot be penalised for failing to track court cases online. Setting aside a dismissal in a property dispute, the Court emphasised that digital access and technological awareness vary significantly among elderly litigants.

Supreme Court Rules Lawyers Cannot Surrender or Compromise Clients’ Property Rights Without Explicit Consent

The Supreme Court held that advocates cannot surrender or compromise a client’s substantive property rights without explicit authorisation. The Court ruled that a compromise decree based solely on a lawyer’s consent, without the client’s signature or approval, is legally unsustainable under the Civil Procedure Code.

70 Years, 4 Generations, One Land Dispute: Supreme Court Finally Ends Legal Battle, Upholds 1957 Sale Deed

The Supreme Court ended a land dispute that lasted 70 years and spanned four generations by upholding a registered 1957 sale deed. The Court ruled that minor discrepancies cannot invalidate a sale deed unless there are allegations of fraud or forgery.

Possession Does Not End Rights, Homebuyer Can Seek Compensation for Delayed Delivery: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court ruled that homebuyers can approach consumer forums for compensation over delayed possession even after taking flat possession. The Court set aside the NCDRC order and held that arbitration clauses cannot prevent buyers from seeking remedies against real estate developers for deficient services.

If A Coconut Tree Could Laugh, It Would Laugh At These Neighbours: Kerala High Court On Neighbours’ Fight

The Kerala High Court dismissed a plea over a coconut tree on a neighbour’s land, calling it a classic case of unnecessary litigation driven by ego clashes between neighbours. Remarking that the tree itself might laugh at the dispute, the Court said its quiet existence had unnecessarily become the subject of valuable judicial time.

Daughter-In-Law Cannot Claim Residence In Sister-In-Law’s Property After Husband’s Right To Stay Ends: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court ruled that a daughter-in-law cannot continue occupying a property owned by her sister-in-law once her husband’s permission to stay ends. The Court said any claim for residence or alternate accommodation must be pursued against the husband, not the property’s owner.

Courts Cannot Force Litigants To Accept Compensation Instead Of Relief They Never Sought: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court ruled that a High Court cannot replace mandatory injunction decrees with monetary compensation when such relief was not sought. A Bench of Justices S.V.N. Bhatti and Atul S. Chandurkar set aside the Punjab and Haryana HC order.