The Supreme Court ruled that a principal’s independent action effectively revokes the Power of Attorney (PoA) if known to both the agent and third parties, as evidenced in a property dispute case between two sisters. The ruling emphasizes clear communication and actions in revocation processes. It resulted in the revocation of the PoA favoring the agent, setting a legal precedent.
The Allahabad High Court reserved its verdict on the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah mosque dispute, challenging the legality of the suits filed. The lawsuits seek the removal of the mosque, claiming it stands on the site of a demolished temple. The Muslim side argues that the suits are time-barred and should be dismissed. Senior advocate Manish Goyal has been appointed as amicus curiae in the matter, and the court is yet to address several issues.
On Friday(10th May),Supreme Court dismisses case against Pratap Chandra Dey, husband of Calcutta High Court Justice Amrita Singh, citing political motives in the FIR. After reviewing state counsel’s arguments, the court appears content.
On Wednesday (24th April): The Delhi High Court emphasized a wife’s right to use and benefit from her husband’s property during her lifetime, including its income, for financial independence after his passing. The court clarified that this right does not grant absolute ownership, preventing the wife from selling or transferring the property. Case: Manmohan Singh & Anr vs Shital Singh & Ors.
