Chief Justice of India Justice Surya Kant clarified his controversial cockroaches remark, saying a section of the media had misquoted his oral observations and wrongly portrayed them as criticism of the country’s youth during recent coverage in reports.
Today, On 16th December, the Bar Council of India informed the Supreme Court that practicing advocates cannot work full-time as journalists, citing Rule 49 to prevent conflicts of interest. The court and petitioner acknowledged this stance, emphasizing the necessity for advocates to focus solely on their legal responsibilities to maintain professional integrity and public trust.
Today, On 6th December, the Supreme Court dismissed a petition against lawyers affiliated with political parties participating in Bar Council elections, asserting that political beliefs do not disqualify their involvement. The Court emphasized the independence of bar associations and allowed individuals to hold office despite political ideologies, highlighting the need for balancing responsibilities and beliefs.
Today, On 21st October, the Supreme Court found Senior Advocate Rishi Malhotra made false statements in at least 15 cases, leading to concerns over Advocate-on-Record (AoR) guidelines. The Court appointed Dr. S. Muralidhar as Amicus Curiae and scheduled a hearing for November 11 to address these issues and reform oversight of AoRs.
Today (23rd May): Delhi High Court directs Bar Council to assess fitness of elderly lawyer due to “acute behavioral issues” observed during court appearance. Justices Kait and Jain highlight lawyer’s erratic behavior and poor vision as unbecoming of legal professional. Lawyer discharged with caution to maintain courtroom decorum in future appearances. Registry instructed to communicate order to Bar Council for assessment.
