The Allahabad High Court sharply criticised state authorities for their persistent failure to act promptly on a plea seeking medical termination of pregnancy for a minor rape survivor with mental disability. The Court highlighted delays that adversely affected the victim’s access to timely medical care.
The Supreme Court objected to AIIMS plea seeking reversal of its order allowing a 15-year-old rape survivor to terminate a 30-week pregnancy. It urged the Centre to amend abortion laws, stressing no time limit in rape cases and calling for a responsive, evolving legal framework.
Today, On 24th April, The Supreme Court observed that no court can compel a woman, especially a minor, to carry a pregnancy against her will, emphasising reproductive autonomy. It permitted a 15-year-old girl to medically terminate her pregnancy despite crossing seven months gestation.
Today, On 6th February, Supreme Court allows termination of a 30-week unwanted pregnancy, emphasizing that reproductive autonomy is a fundamental right for women.The Court stated that no court can force a woman, especially a minor, to continue an unwanted pregnancy.
The Delhi High Court has urged lawmakers to frame a clear law on protecting the rights of a viable foetus while safeguarding maternal autonomy. The Court allowed a 15-year-old rape survivor to terminate her 27-week pregnancy, stressing urgent legislative clarity.
AIIMS has moved the Delhi High Court against an order permitting a 16-year-old rape survivor to terminate her 27-week pregnancy. The institute warned of risks to her future reproductive health.
Delhi High Court permits a minor girl to terminate her 27-week pregnancy resulting from sexual assault. Court cites mental trauma and directs AIIMS to carry out procedure with full state support.
Today(on 15th May),Supreme Court rejects plea from 20-year-old woman to terminate her 27-week pregnancy, citing fetus’s right to life. The decision, led by Justice B.R. Gavai, upholds Delhi High Court’s earlier ruling denying termination.
Calcutta High Court has sought an explanation from a group of doctors regarding the medical termination of a minor petitioner’s pregnancy. This action came after the court had specifically ordered the formation of a Medical Board to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of proceeding with the pregnancy termination, rather than authorizing the procedure itself. The […]
