The Delhi High Court Bar Association has moved the Delhi High Court challenging the Full Court’s decision to form a judges’ committee to examine raising courts’ pecuniary jurisdiction in Delhi from Rs 2 crore to Rs 20 crore.
The Delhi High Court questioned the DHCBA’s decision to abstain from judicial work over proposed pecuniary jurisdiction changes, with Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav observing that lawyers’ strikes ultimately harm litigants and grievances must be raised through proper legal mechanisms.
Delhi High Court Bar Association resolved to abstain from work on Monday in protest against the Delhi High Court’s move on increasing district courts’ pecuniary jurisdiction from Rs.2 crore to Rs.20 crore, citing major impact on litigation structure and lawyers.
The Delhi High Court has invited bar association representatives for a meeting on January 30 to discuss increasing the pecuniary jurisdiction of district courts. Lawyers have long demanded the move to reduce delays, cut litigation costs, and ensure faster justice.
The Coordination Committee of All District Courts Bar Associations of Delhi has issued a circular titled “Initiative to Enhance the Pecuniary Jurisdiction of Delhi District Courts”, urging immediate revision of the current pecuniary limit to tackle pendency effectively.
The New Delhi Bar Association has demanded an increase in the pecuniary jurisdiction of Delhi district courts from Rs 2 crore to Rs 20 crore, citing rising case pendency and outdated limits. The association said this move would speed up trials and ease the burden on the Delhi High Court.
Delhi’s Bar Associations are advocating for a tenfold increase in district courts’ pecuniary jurisdiction, from Rs 2 crore to Rs 20 crore, due to rising inflation. They met Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal to discuss amending the Delhi High Court Act, highlighting the need for the change to address outdated limits and reduce the High Court’s burden.
The Delhi High Court approved an expansion of jurisdiction for Civil Judges in Delhi District Courts, allowing them to hear higher monetary disputes. This move aims to increase efficiency, reduce case backlogs, and align Delhi’s courts with neighboring areas. The decision reflects a strategic approach to judicial management and is expected to improve the overall responsiveness and efficiency of the court system in Delhi.
