The Delhi High Court said that public figures must be ready to face criticism, satire, and public comments unless it is humiliating or defamatory. The Court also warned that personality rights cases cannot be used to seek blanket removal of news reports and online content.
![[BREAKING] Patanjali Case | "Your Public Apology Published Was Illegible, Font Miniscule": SC Slams IMA President Over His 'Damaging' Statements](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/shared-image.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Indian Medical Association’s Chief, Dr. R V Asokan, publicly apologized for remarks made about the Supreme Court, clarifying that he meant no disrespect. This followed the Court’s comments during a case involving misleading advertisements. The IMA has filed a petition against such ads and emphasizes the priority of promoting ethical practices within the association.
The Supreme Court of India recently upheld the consumer’s right to health and quality product information in advertising. Justices directed advertisers to submit a self-declaration form confirming compliance with the Advertising Code before advertising. The court emphasized the importance of protecting consumers and urged the relevant ministries to establish a consumer complaint system.
