“Exclusion Clauses Can’t Defeat Insurance Claims”: Supreme Court Says Any Ambiguity Must Favour Insured

The Supreme Court ruled that exclusion clauses in insurance policies must be interpreted strictly and any ambiguity must benefit the insured. The Court held that when loss is caused by fire, the reason behind the fire becomes irrelevant for insurance liability.

Sreesanth’s IPL Injury: Supreme Court Stay NCDRC Order Asking Insurer to Pay Rs.82.8 Lakh to Rajasthan Royals

The Supreme Court has stayed the NCDRC’s order directing United India Insurance to pay ₹82.8 lakh to Rajasthan Royals over Sreesanth’s 2012 IPL injury, putting the high-profile insurance dispute under further judicial review.

Supreme Court Closes 18-Year Loophole, Restores Power of Consumer Forums to Enforce All Orders

The Supreme Court has ruled that consumer forums can enforce all their orders like civil court decrees, ending an 18-year gap caused by a 2002 amendment. The judgment ensures consumers get real justice and not just “paper victories.”

INSURANCE CLAIM Cannot Be Denied Just Because Column On Form Was Left Blank: NCDRC Slams Bharti Axa Life Insurance

The NCDRC ruled that an insurance claim cannot be denied merely because a column was left blank in the proposal form, slamming Bharti Axa Life Insurance for rejection.

WhatsApp Challenges UP Consumer Court Order Before Allahabad High Court Over Six-Hour Service Disruption Complaint

WhatsApp has filed a petition in the Allahabad High Court against a ruling by the Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Commission, which allowed a consumer complaint regarding a service disruption to proceed in Indian courts. The high court has put the proceedings on hold until further notice, with the next hearing scheduled for July.

Supreme Court Upholds Pecuniary Jurisdiction Provisions in Consumer Protection Act, 2019: “Jurisdiction Should Be Based on Price Paid, Not Compensation Sought”

The Supreme Court has upheld the validity of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 provisions, ruling that pecuniary jurisdiction must be based on the actual amount paid for goods or services, not the compensation claimed.

Supreme Court: “Borrower Cannot Be Classified as a Consumer Under Consumer Protection Act If Loan Taken for Profit”

The Supreme Court ruled that a borrower does not qualify as a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act if the loan is taken for profit-making purposes. A bench comprising Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Prashant Kumar Mishra made this observation while hearing an appeal by the Central Bank of India against a decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC). The ruling clarifies the scope of consumer rights in financial transactions.

Maruti Suzuki Chairman Seeks FIR Quashing, Delhi HC Demands Status Report

The Chairman of Maruti Suzuki approached the Delhi High Court to quash an FIR filed against him. In response, the court has directed the authorities to submit a status report on the case. The matter is now under judicial review to assess the validity of the allegations. The court’s decision will determine the next legal steps in the case.

Supreme Court Set-aside NCDRC Judgment: “Banks Charging Over 30% Interest on Credit Card Dues Are Unfair Trade Practices”

Today, On 20th December, The Supreme Court set-aside the NCDRC’s 2008 decision that limited credit card interest rates to 30%. The NCDRC earlier criticized banks for charging high rates of 36% to 49% on overdue payments. The Supreme Court’s ruling will affect how banks set interest on credit card dues. This decision shows a change in financial regulation policies.

Medical Negligence Requires Proof of Lack of Skill or Reasonable Care, Says Supreme Court

The Supreme Court ruled that doctors can only be held liable for negligence when lacking the necessary qualifications or skills, or failing to apply reasonable expertise in treatment. The court emphasized that complications alone do not prove negligence, setting aside an earlier judgment of the NCDRC that awarded compensation.