Supreme Court Set-aside NCDRC Judgment: “Banks Charging Over 30% Interest on Credit Card Dues Are Unfair Trade Practices”

Today, On 20th December, The Supreme Court set-aside the NCDRC’s 2008 decision that limited credit card interest rates to 30%. The NCDRC earlier criticized banks for charging high rates of 36% to 49% on overdue payments. The Supreme Court’s ruling will affect how banks set interest on credit card dues. This decision shows a change in financial regulation policies.

Medical Negligence Requires Proof of Lack of Skill or Reasonable Care, Says Supreme Court

The Supreme Court ruled that doctors can only be held liable for negligence when lacking the necessary qualifications or skills, or failing to apply reasonable expertise in treatment. The court emphasized that complications alone do not prove negligence, setting aside an earlier judgment of the NCDRC that awarded compensation.

SBI Moves NCDRC to Transfer Home Loan Dispute Involving Madras HC Justice J Nisha Banu Outside Tamil Nadu

SBI has asked the NCDRC to transfer a home loan dispute involving Madras High Court Justice J Nisha Banu to a forum outside Tamil Nadu, citing concerns of potential bias. The case is currently with the Madurai District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

“This Is An Important Issue”: SC Will Examine Whether ‘Trust’ is a ‘Consumer’ Under Consumer Protection Act

The Supreme Court observed Today (Sept 11) that it was an important issue and posted the matter for hearing on September 18. The Court was hearing a batch of appeals against several decisions of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), all of which raised a common question of law.

“Requesting Physical Copies After E-Filing Undermines the Purpose of Digital Filing”: CJI to NCDRC

Today, On 21st August, The Supreme Court ruled that asking for physical copies of documents after e-filing undermines the purpose of digital filing. This came up during a case at the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC). The court emphasized the need for effective digital filing and urged swift resolution of related issues. The progress in digital filing will be updated at the next hearing.

Delayed Flat Possession| Supreme Court Orders Builder to Refund Home Buyers

Today, On 29th July, The Supreme Court upheld the NCDRC’s decision, ordering a builder to refund home buyers for delayed possession of flats. The court increased the interest rate to 12 percent, emphasizing the buyer’s prolonged suffering. The ruling requires the developer to refund the entire amount with 12 percent interest and compensate the buyers within three months.

Two NCDRC Members involved in Ireo Grace Realtech Case, SC Closes Contempt Cases

Today (15th May): The Supreme Court closed the contempt of court case against two NCDRC members in the Ireo Grace Realtech case, despite dissatisfaction with their explanation. The court stressed the importance of obeying orders and urged caution. The case originated from non-bailable warrants issued against Ireo Grace’s directors despite a Supreme Court stay order.

Mockery of this Court, Absolute impunity By SC While Issuing Notice To NCDRC Members for Contempt

Today (3rd April): The Supreme Court issued a contempt notice to NCDRC members for defying a stay order and issuing Non-Bailable Warrants to a real estate firm. Despite their apology, the Court found their actions to be a mockery of the court and an act of absolute impunity. The seriousness of the situation was emphasized due to the potential impact on individuals’ life and liberty.

EXCLUSIVE | Railways to Pay Rs 1.45 Lakh Compensation to a Passenger

What led to a consumer court mandating the Railways to pay Rs 1.45 lakh in compensation to a passenger? The district consumer disputes redressal commission concluded that the complainant experienced direct harm due to the inadequate service provided by the Railways.

Yash Raj Films Not Liable for Compensation, SC Set Aside NCDRC Order Over “Fan” Song Dispute

Today (22nd April): The Supreme Court set aside the NCDRC’s order involving Yash Raj Films and the song “Jabra Fan.” The dispute arose when a consumer sought compensation for the song’s absence in the movie “Fan.” YRF successfully argued that the consumer did not qualify as a consumer and had publicly disclosed the song’s exclusion before the movie’s release.