Delhi High Court permits Priya Sachdev Kapur to submit details of Sunjay Kapur’s estate in a sealed cover, maintaining confidentiality. Copies of the will will be shared with family, while the original stays with the court.
Today, On 7th January, The Supreme Court is hearing the case of Atul Subhash, a 34-year-old who died by suicide in December. Atul had accused Nikita Singhania and her family of harassment through false cases, causing immense pressure on him and his parents. During the hearing, Nikita’s lawyer responded to questions about the whereabouts of Atul’s son. The case continues to gather significant public and legal attention.
![[Doctor’s Rape & Murder Case] "The Media, as Democracy's Fourth Pillar, Keeps The Public Informed & Engaged in National Issues.": HC on Dr. Sandip Ghosh's Petition Against Media Trial](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-6-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 22nd August, The Calcutta High Court addressed Dr. Sandip Ghosh’s plea against the “media trial” of the RG Kar Medical College case, acknowledging its global significance and the impact of media coverage on judicial proceedings. The court ruled against imposing restrictions on the media and intermediaries, emphasizing their responsibility to act responsibly. The writ petition was subsequently dismissed.
![[Breaking]Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Mother of JD(S) Leader Bhavani Revenna](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/MicrosoftTeams-image-93.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Karnataka High Court today granted anticipatory bail to Bhavani Revanna in a kidnapping case connected to sexual abuse allegations against her son, Prajwal Revanna. The court emphasized the avoidance of media trials and unnecessary arrests of women. Bhavani is accused of kidnapping a woman sexually assaulted by her son, who is currently in custody facing multiple accusations.
Today, 13th May, Umar Khalid’s bail plea, filed under UAPA in the Delhi riots case, is pending a decision from the Karkardooma Court. The court reserved the order after arguments from both sides. Khalid’s defense emphasizes lack of substantial evidence and bias in media trial. The Delhi Police, opposing the bail, cited his alleged attempts to influence bail hearings through social media.
Today, 24th April,Umar Khalid’s lawyer argued in court that the allegations against him do not amount to a terrorism offense, emphasizing the lack of evidence. The defense also highlighted media scrutiny and called for a fair legal process. Khalid’s bail request is under consideration, with the next hearing scheduled for May 7. The lawyer cited inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case and urged the court to assess the evidence critically.
![[Delhi Excise case] Delhi Court takes Cognizance of ED chargesheet Filed against K Kavitha & Others](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/MicrosoftTeams-image-74.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
On Tuesday (9th April): K Kavitha, a leader of Bharat Rashtra Samiti (BRS), wrote a letter from jail expressing distress over the investigation by central agencies and media trial, which she claims damaged her reputation. She alleged harassment and coercion by agencies, and asserted her cooperation. She also emphasized the impact of her absence on her minor son and requested consideration for bail.