Karnataka High Court Questions ‘Media Trial Madness’ in Darshan Case: ‘There Is Already a Gag Order’

The Karnataka High Court raised serious concerns over sensational media coverage in the Renukaswamy murder case involving actor Darshan. The Court questioned unchecked “media trials” despite an existing gag order and reserved its verdict on curbing such reporting.

“Digital Vigilantism Has Consequences”: Delhi High Court Pulls Up Richa Chadha, Media Over Unverified Sexual Misconduct Allegations

The Delhi High Court criticised Richa Chadha and media houses for amplifying unverified sexual misconduct allegations, calling it “digital vigilantism.” The Court said such actions damage reputation, violate presumption of innocence, and ordered removal of defamatory content.

Anil Ambani Moves Bombay High Court Against Arnab Goswami, Republic TV Over Defamation; Seeks Immediate Ban on Broadcasts

Business tycoon Anil Ambani has filed a defamation suit in the Bombay High Court against Arnab Goswami and Republic TV over alleged defamatory broadcasts. He has sought an interim injunction to restrain the channel from airing or publishing the disputed content.

“CBI Pressured Witness to Frame Ram Rahim”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Acquits Dera Chief in Journalist Murder Case

The Punjab and Haryana High Court acquitted Dera Sacha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh in the 2002 murder case of journalist Ram Chander Chhatrapati. The Court observed that the CBI appeared to have coerced a key witness and said Ram Rahim’s guilt was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

Public Outrage Can’t Decide Guilt: Supreme Court Says Truth, Not Popular Opinion, Must Guide Investigations

The Supreme Court said public anger in high-profile cases is understandable but cannot control investigations or court decisions. Justice must be based on evidence and impartial inquiry, not media pressure or majority sentiment.

“How Will a Film Affect Trial?” Kerala High Court Questions Plea to Stop Movie Inspired by Venjaramoodu Mass Murder

The Kerala High Court expressed strong doubts over a plea seeking to restrain the release of a Malayalam film allegedly inspired by the Venjaramoodu mass murder case. The Court questioned how a creative artwork could interfere with a fair criminal trial and agreed to hear the matter further.

‘Nobody Is Above You’: Mamata Banerjee Urges CJI to ‘Save Constitution, Save Democracy’ Amid ED Targeting Claims

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, speaking before CJI Surya Kant at the Calcutta High Court’s Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench inauguration, urged the judiciary to protect the Constitution and democracy. Her remarks came amid the ED raids controversy involving I-PAC, with Banerjee alleging deliberate targeting by central agencies.

‘What’s So Special? Not Everything Should Be Public’: Delhi High Court Allows Priya Kapur to File Sunjay Kapur’s Assets in Sealed Cover

Delhi High Court permits Priya Sachdev Kapur to submit details of Sunjay Kapur’s estate in a sealed cover, maintaining confidentiality. Copies of the will will be shared with family, while the original stays with the court.

Atul Subhash Suicide | ‘Where Is Atul’s Son?’: Supreme Court Hears Nikita Singhania’s Lawyer

Today, On 7th January, The Supreme Court is hearing the case of Atul Subhash, a 34-year-old who died by suicide in December. Atul had accused Nikita Singhania and her family of harassment through false cases, causing immense pressure on him and his parents. During the hearing, Nikita’s lawyer responded to questions about the whereabouts of Atul’s son. The case continues to gather significant public and legal attention.

[Doctor’s Rape & Murder Case] “The Media, as Democracy’s Fourth Pillar, Keeps The Public Informed & Engaged in National Issues.”: HC on Dr. Sandip Ghosh’s Petition Against Media Trial

Today, On 22nd August, The Calcutta High Court addressed Dr. Sandip Ghosh’s plea against the “media trial” of the RG Kar Medical College case, acknowledging its global significance and the impact of media coverage on judicial proceedings. The court ruled against imposing restrictions on the media and intermediaries, emphasizing their responsibility to act responsibly. The writ petition was subsequently dismissed.