The Delhi High Court said Aaj Tak, “probably in the zeal of securing higher TRPs,” violated the privacy and confidentiality rights of a child sexual abuse survivor, while upholding a Rs.5 lakh compensation order against the broadcaster.
The Patna High Court ruled that media can report criminal proceedings but should avoid labels like “mastermind” or “kingpin” that suggest guilt before trial. Justice Ansul said prejudicial reporting may harm an accused’s reputation and amount to defamatory or improper conduct during pending cases.
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the Delhi High Court recused herself from hearing TMC MP Mahua Moitra’s plea challenging the criminal defamation case filed by Zee Media, with the court confirming that the matter will now be listed before another bench next week.
The Delhi High Court clarified that it does not intend to take any action against journalist Manisha Pande for her video remarks describing TV Today’s content as “shit.” The Court added it would not prejudice her professional career.
The Delhi High Court strongly criticised Newslaundry journalist Manisha Pande for using the word “shit” while commenting on TV Today Network’s content, calling it gross and indecent. The Court warned that such language could invite serious observations and orders that may severely affect her professional career.
Journalists Shazia Nisar and Adarsh Jha were arrested by Noida Police for allegedly blackmailing Bharat24 CMD Jagdish Chandra with a fake rape case threat and extorting money. Both are now in judicial custody.
NBDSA has instructed all news broadcasters to ensure thumbnails and tickers accurately reflect the program’s content. This follows a complaint against Times Now Navbharat for a misleading thumbnail suggesting harassment by Muslim men, which contradicted the women’s actual statements in the interview, highlighting broader concerns over media accuracy and communal harmony.
Today, On 18th December, During hearing on Alt-News Co-founder Mohammed Zubair’s plea, the Allahabad High Court stated, “Whatever Yati Narsinghanand says, you cannot go to social media.” Zubair is challenging an FIR that accuses him of promoting enmity through a post on ‘X.’ The court highlighted the importance of addressing grievances through legal avenues instead of social media. The case focuses on finding a balance between free speech and its potential misuse in inciting public unrest.
Today, On 16th December, the Bar Council of India informed the Supreme Court that practicing advocates cannot work full-time as journalists, citing Rule 49 to prevent conflicts of interest. The court and petitioner acknowledged this stance, emphasizing the necessity for advocates to focus solely on their legal responsibilities to maintain professional integrity and public trust.
Today(13th August), the Delhi High Court ordered Rajdeep Sardesai and India Today to take down a video allegedly showing BJP leader Shazia Ilmi “abusing” a journalist. The order came after Ilmi filed a defamation suit, prompting Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora to act.
