The Madras High Court directed that postal articles addressed to deceased persons should be delivered to their legal heirs living at the same address instead of being returned to the sender. The Court also asked the Ministry of Communications to clarify gaps in the Post Office Regulations, 2024.
The Madras High Court ruled that simply using the words “Waqf” or “Mosque” in a title deed is not enough to prove dedication of property as a public waqf. The Court held that if ownership and income remain with family members, the property will be treated as a private waqf or family trust.
The Madras High Court held that a deity, recognised as a juristic person in law, cannot be left without legal remedy despite lacking voting rights. The court ordered recovery of encroached lands of Balasubramanya Swamy Temple.
The Madras High Court directed the Income Tax Settlement Commission to reconsider Khazana Jewellery’s settlement plea involving 268 kg undisclosed gold stock, quashing its 2020 rejection and ordering a fresh review to avert penalties, interest, and prosecution.
The Madras High Court rejected the police claim that a 63-year-old man injured himself inside a police vehicle, calling the explanation “fantastic.” The Court upheld Rs 6 lakh compensation ordered by the State Human Rights Commission for custodial assault.
The Madras High Court criticised State officials for remaining ex parte in a 2001 case involving government “Natham Poramboke” land, calling it a serious lapse affecting public interest. The Court directed strict guidelines, timelines, and disciplinary action to protect government property in future cases.
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court suggested that the Tamil Nadu government allow five persons named by the Court to offer symbolic prayers for 15 minutes near the Deepathoon atop Thiruparankundram hill. The Court clarified that the proposal is only a suggestion, not a direction, amid the Karthigai Deepam contempt proceedings.
The Madras High Court sharply criticised TN Minister S. Reghupathy for his remark on the Thiruparankundram Karthigai Deepam issue, saying, “I conclude that Thiru. Ragupathy has given a mischievous political spin to the turn of events.”
The Madras High Court has restrained internet service providers and cable TV operators from illegally streaming Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond. Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy passed the interim order on a plea by Sunshine Pictures Limited citing pre-release copyright infringement concerns.
P. S. Raman declined consent to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against retired D. Hariparanthaman over remarks on sitting judge G. R. Swaminathan. Under Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, Advocate General approval is mandatory for private criminal contempt petitions before High Courts.
