The Supreme Court held that the Company Law Board has no power under the Limitation Act to condone delay in appeals under the Companies Act. Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan overturned a Calcutta High Court backed order.
In a partition appeal, Madras High Court ruled that a daughter is entitled to ½ share in ancestral property under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The Court held that the 2012 sale deed is not binding.
The Supreme Court has clarified that in cases of usufructuary mortgage, the limitation period does not begin from the date of mortgage creation. Instead, it starts only from the date when the mortgage amount is paid or adjusted, reaffirming the mortgagor’s continuing right of redemption.
In a landmark judgment concerning the scope of limitation laws, the Supreme Court has drawn a clear distinction between original proceedings and appellate remedies under Section 6 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Earlier, on March 5, 2025, the Allahabad High Court permitted certain amendments sought by the plaintiffs in the case. Prayagraj, April 3 – The Allahabad High Court has scheduled May 6, 2025, to announce its decision on a plea seeking to include Radha Rani as a plaintiff in the long-standing legal dispute over Krishna Janmbhumi […]
Prayagraj, March 19: The Allahabad High Court has asked the Muslim side to respond to a plea related to the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute in Mathura.
The Allahabad High Court set March 5 for hearing the case related to the Shahi Idgah dispute. The case involves a legal battle over the ownership of the site. The Muslim side had filed an application to amend its petition. The court will now consider the request and proceed with the hearing.
Today, On 20th September, the Supreme Court adjourned Maneka Gandhi’s petition against the election of Samajwadi Party candidate Ram Bhual Nishad until September 30. Gandhi contends irregularities, including Nishad’s failure to disclose his full criminal record. Her appeal challenges the Allahabad High Court’s ruling that her petition was time-barred under election law.
Today, On 17th September, The Supreme Court requested clarification from the Muslim side in the Shahi Idgah mosque dispute regarding the filing of an appeal in the High Court. The legal battle involves a land dispute claimed by the Hindu community. The court aims to ensure a proper judicial process. The next hearing is scheduled for November 4.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court addressed the applicability of procedural law to time-barred petitions filed before the enactment of the BNSS, 2023. It clarified that petitions with condoned delays after July 1, 2024, will be governed by the CrPC, 1973, rather than the new BNSS, ensuring consistency in legal proceedings. The case is scheduled for further hearing on July 4, 2024.
