The Supreme Court fined comedian Samay Raina and four others Rs.3 lakh each for violating its orders in a case over insensitive remarks about persons with disabilities. The Court said Raina had “taken the court for a ride” and acted brazenly.
The Supreme Court issued notice on petitions filed by Muslim parties challenging the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Bhojshala ruling. The High Court had declared the Bhojshala–Kamal Maula complex a Saraswati temple and prohibited offering namaz at the site.
The Bombay High Court held that an ongoing police investigation cannot justify violating a citizen’s constitutional rights, reaffirming the protection of privacy under Article 21. The Court directed the Maharashtra Government to pay Rs.10,000 compensation to the woman, permitting recovery of the amount from the erring police officers.
The Supreme Court questioned the Karnataka High Court’s decision to discharge JD(S) leader H.D. Revanna in a sexual harassment case filed by a former domestic worker. “How can the High Court change the charges after the trial court took cognisance?” the Bench asked.
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant constituted four special benches to fast-track some of the Supreme Court’s oldest pending civil and criminal cases. “The judiciary’s foremost obligation is not merely to decide cases, but to decide them within a timeframe that preserves faith in the rule of law,” he said.
The Supreme Court of India denied anticipatory bail to Kerala professor Dr. M.K. Ram in a Dalit student suicide case, calling his conduct inhuman. The Bench said he cannot evade accountability and must face the legal consequences.
The Allahabad High Court held that strict proof of marriage should not defeat a maintenance claim where parties lived as husband and wife, setting aside a family court order that denied maintenance solely for want of legal marriage.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that a husband’s care and attention towards his parents, or disputes with in-laws, cannot justify a wife leaving the matrimonial home and subsequently claiming maintenance under the law.
The Delhi High Court designated 85 advocates as Senior Advocates after the Full Court approved the proposal on July 9, 2026, conferring the honour under Section 16(2) of the Advocates Act, 1961, recognising their professional excellence and standing.
The Supreme Court remarked that even a snail would question the pace of a civil trial after noting that a suit filed in 2015 remained at the plaintiff’s evidence stage in 2026. The Court termed the delay starkly inconsistent with legislative intent.
