Today, On 1st December, The Supreme Court refused to entertain a plea seeking security from the Lawrence Bishnoi gang, questioning the basis of the threat. The bench asked who was threatening the petitioner and noted there was no material showing any danger requiring court intervention
The Supreme Court emphasized the “need for airport agencies to sensitise their officers in prevailing laws” while quashing a case against an NRI over a Rolex watch seizure. The court noted that detention or arrest should not be taken in haste.
Today, On 10th October, Supreme Court rejected a plea seeking guidelines on suspension and blocking of social media accounts, questioning the petitioner, “What is your fundamental right to have access to WhatsApp?” and refused to interfere in private platform regulations.
The Supreme Court noted complaints of mishandling of encounter victims’ bodies in Chhattisgarh but said “contempt petition will not help”, advising families to pursue remedies through NHRC or other legal channels.
Insurer denies the claims that leds Insurance disputes, sometimes valide and sometimes unjustified. Resolution depends on state laws, claim type, policy terms, etc. Understanding all the aspects and legal remedies relating to Insurance Dispute.
New Delhi: Today, 24th Feb, The Supreme Court of India refused to hear a plea demanding regulation of Internet prices in the country. The court stated that consumers have multiple service providers to choose from and that it is a free market.A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar dismissed the petition filed by an individual named Rajat.
NEW DELHI: Today (11th Feb): The Supreme Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the National Federation of Indian Women (NFIW), which is associated with the CPI. The PIL raised concerns about the rising incidents of mob lynching and violence, especially by cow vigilantes. The Bench, led by Justice BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran, referred to its previous ruling in the case of Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India and stated that while the ruling is binding on all authorities, the Court cannot oversee or monitor such incidents in every part of the country.
The Lokpal has dismissed a corruption complaint against former Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud, citing lack of jurisdiction. The anti-corruption Inspector clarified that sitting judges and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court do not fall within its purview under Section 14 of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act. This provision restricts the Lokpal’s authority to probe complaints against such high-ranking judicial officials.
The Supreme Court has halted today (17th Sept) bulldozer demolitions across India until at least October 1, except on public roads, water bodies, or railway lines with court permission. This follows a plea challenging the demolition of a family’s house in Gujarat. The Court aims to establish clear demolition guidelines nationwide. Solicitor General Mehta objected, but the Court emphasized the need for regulation.
The Consumer Protection Act of 2019, replacing the 1986 law, focuses on contemporary consumer issues in India. It defines consumers and outlines the role of consumer forums, emphasizes the avenues for filing complaints, the process, and the timeline for resolution.
