Supreme Court: “We Can’t Sit in Delhi & Micromanage Action Against Mob Lynching & Cow Vigilantism”

NEW DELHI: Today (11th Feb): The Supreme Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the National Federation of Indian Women (NFIW), which is associated with the CPI. The PIL raised concerns about the rising incidents of mob lynching and violence, especially by cow vigilantes. The Bench, led by Justice BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran, referred to its previous ruling in the case of Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India and stated that while the ruling is binding on all authorities, the Court cannot oversee or monitor such incidents in every part of the country.

Lokpal Dismissed Corruption Complaint Against Ex-CJI Chandrachud: “Barred By Jurisdiction”

The Lokpal has dismissed a corruption complaint against former Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud, citing lack of jurisdiction. The anti-corruption Inspector clarified that sitting judges and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court do not fall within its purview under Section 14 of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act. This provision restricts the Lokpal’s authority to probe complaints against such high-ranking judicial officials.

“No Demolitions Shall Proceed Without Court’s Approval”: SC Stops Bulldozer Demolitions Across India Until October 1

The Supreme Court has halted today (17th Sept) bulldozer demolitions across India until at least October 1, except on public roads, water bodies, or railway lines with court permission. This follows a plea challenging the demolition of a family’s house in Gujarat. The Court aims to establish clear demolition guidelines nationwide. Solicitor General Mehta objected, but the Court emphasized the need for regulation.

Consumer Court Case Filing | Process and Timeline from District to National Levels Explained

The Consumer Protection Act of 2019, replacing the 1986 law, focuses on contemporary consumer issues in India. It defines consumers and outlines the role of consumer forums, emphasizes the avenues for filing complaints, the process, and the timeline for resolution.

IMA vs. UOI | Supreme Court Levies Rs.10,000 Fine on Intervention Applicant for Alleged Proxy Litigation in ‘Patanjali Case’

The Supreme Court fined an intervention applicant Rs.10,000 for attempting to join a case against Patanjali Ayurved with misleading claims. The applicant alleged a quack doctor’s role in their mother’s death, but the court dismissed the application, warning against manipulating the legal process. Patanjali faced criticism for misleading advertisements and offered an unconditional apology.

Delhi HC: Reviewing if ‘Google Ads Terms’ Exclude Advertisers from Arbitration in India

Delhi High Court examines a case regarding Google Ads’ impact on Indian advertisers’ arbitration rights. Startupwala demands reinstatement of ads disapproved by Google, citing Arbitration Act. NEW DELHI: Recently, The Delhi High Court examining a case involving Google’s advertising system and its potential impact on Indian advertisers’ ability to seek legal recourse domestically. A petition […]

Gujarat High Court: No Probe Initiated into Assault on Foreign Students

Today(18th March),The Gujarat High Court, led by Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal and Justice Aniruddha P Mayee, clarified its non-investigative role in PILs related to the assault on foreign students at a government hostel. The court emphasized its commitment to judicial responsibilities and distinct role from law enforcement, declining to directly intervene despite advocate Koshti’s concerns.