Delhi High Court directed the Bar Council of India not to take any decision on its show cause notice against Dentons Link Legal, which is facing allegations of violating rules linked to foreign law firms’ entry.
The Supreme Court has directed the Bar Council of India to investigate allegations of “ghost lawyers” who allegedly forged a settlement in a property dispute, falsely represented a party, and secured an order favouring the opposing side.
Today, On 11th August, The Supreme Court criticised the growing “trend among lawyers to critique judges of HC and trial courts,” noting that in political cases, there is often an assumption that justice cannot be delivered in the High Court.
Former CJI D Y Chandrachud said India’s legal education system has major gaps despite producing top lawyers. He urged reforms, tech skills, and mental health support for the profession.
The Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana has issued notices to 16 advocates regarding allegations of bench hunting at the High Court. Senior Advocates Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Mukul Rohatgi will also be asked to respond to the Privilege Committee.
A junior lawyer fainted in the Bombay High Court after being sternly reprimanded by Justice A.S. Gadkari. The incident reignites concerns over courtroom conduct and the mental pressure faced by young advocates.
The Jharkhand High Court criticised the railway police for summoning a lawyer defending an accused. It said, “Summoning of advocate by investigating officer is disturbing,” and emphasised that client-lawyer communication is privileged under law.
SCAORA asks Chief Justice Gavai to ban videography and social media content creation by advocates inside Supreme Court premises. Citing risks to decorum, security, and public trust, the letter warns against “impermissible solicitation” and misuse of court footage.
The Supreme Court has ruled in favour of an Advocate-on-Record (AoR) following a previous split verdict in a misconduct case. The latest ruling resolves a long-standing dispute over alleged professional misconduct.
A PIL in the Supreme Court urges recognition of consumers’ “right to know” about product quality and seller information. The plea demands transparency to protect buyers from fraud and unfair trade practices.
