The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has held that the welfare of children cannot compel spouses to continue in a marriage that has ceased to be workable, confirming a divorce granted to the wife on grounds of cruelty.
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court asked whether citizens can be blamed for acting when officials fail, and ordered a special sitting on October 10 to decide the bail of two villagers who removed illegally laid culvert pipes.
“No game of hide and seek”: the Madras High Court has held that FCRA Registration was rightly refused to a Kodaikanal Zen meditation trust, since an applicant under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act must correctly disclose its religious character. Madurai: The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has dismissed an appeal by Kanzeon Public […]
A Division Bench of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a husband’s appeal against refusal of divorce on grounds of cruelty, holding that childlessness cannot be converted into a matrimonial fault of the wife and that marriage cannot be reduced to the sole object of procreation.
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has dismissed a husband’s appeals against the refusal of divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion and a decree of restitution of conjugal rights for his wife, holding that quarrels, family friction and separation do not amount to cruelty or desertion without proof of conduct of the required gravity.
Dissolving a broken-down marriage between two doctors by mutual consent, the Madras High Court has said that just as there are housewives, there can be house husbands too, and that this should become a ‘new normal’ to help preserve the institution of marriage. The Court, waiving the six-month cooling-off period, directed the husband, a cardiologist, to pay Rs 1.5 crore to the wife and Rs 50 lakh to each of their two children.
The Madras High Court ruled that trial judges must actively participate in proceedings and not remain passive observers. Justices GR Swaminathan and R Poornima restored a money recovery suit, holding that courts must seek clarifications and ensure fair trial principles through judicial engagement.
The Madras High Court refused to ban the Tamil film Karuppu, observing that portraying judicial corruption and criticising the judiciary cannot automatically amount to contempt, while emphasising that judges are not beyond scrutiny and freedom of artistic expression must be protected in a democratic society.
The Madras High Court sought a response from the Election Commission of India on allegations that Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam used children during the 2026 Tamil Nadu election campaign, while questioning whether a political party itself could face disqualification for corrupt practices.
Justice G.R. Swaminathan of the Madras High Court criticized self-proclaimed rationalists for mocking devotees who revere gurus as divine, stating that those who label believers as “scoundrels, fools, or barbarians” deserve those descriptions themselves.
