Insurer’s Office At A Place Does Not Give That MACT Jurisdiction Over An Accident Claim: Supreme Court On Section 166(2) Of The Motor Vehicles Act

A road accident victim filed his motor accident claim at Chennai because the insurer had an office there, though he lived in Chittoor and the accident happened in Tirupati. The Supreme Court held that under Section 166(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, an insurer’s place of business does not confer territorial jurisdiction on a Claims Tribunal, unlike a suit under the CPC, and upheld the transfer of the claim to Chittoor.

Major Relief For IAS Sanjay Prasad As Supreme Court Suspends Key Directions In High Court Verdict

The Supreme Court stayed portions of the Allahabad High Court judgment against Uttar Pradesh Additional Chief Secretary (Home) Sanjay Prasad, IAS. The Court suspended directions requiring adverse observations to be forwarded to the DoPT for consideration in future service-related assessments and assignments.

Justice PK Mishra Recuses From Jacqueline Fernandez’s ED Case Says “My Son Appeared For The Government”

Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra recused himself from hearing Jacqueline Fernandez’s plea in the Rs 200-crore money laundering case involving Sukesh Chandrashekhar, citing a conflict of interest arising from a connected matter. The Supreme Court directed that the case be listed on June 25 before a different Bench.

Supreme Court Slams ‘Publicity’ PIL, Clears BPSC Chief Appointment: ‘Give Your Life to a PIL’

The Supreme Court dismissed a public interest litigation challenging Manubhai Parmar’s appointment as BPSC chairman, deeming it factless and publicity-driven. The bench criticized petitioner Brajesh for lacking seriousness and proper grounds, emphasizing that PILs must serve genuine public interest. The matter remains under review as responses are awaited.