The Jharkhand High Court has quashed a notice by the Bihar State Financial Corporation directing tenants of an auctioned property to vacate merely because the premises had been sold. The Court held that the sale of a property is not a ground to evict a tenant, that eviction can proceed only on the grounds specified in the Jharkhand rent-control law, and that the corporation, having taken possession, steps into the landlord’s shoes, with the tenants liable to pay it rent until the property is transferred onward.
Jharkhand High Court slammed the state for failing to hold municipal polls despite orders and issued contempt notices to senior IAS officers. The court warned of framing charges for “willful disobedience.”
The Jharkhand High Court criticised the railway police for summoning a lawyer defending an accused. It said, “Summoning of advocate by investigating officer is disturbing,” and emphasised that client-lawyer communication is privileged under law.
Today, On 5th May, The Supreme Court strongly criticised the Jharkhand High Court for delaying verdicts in criminal cases and directed all High Courts to submit status reports, stating, “This cannot be allowed to happen in a judicial system.”
