The Supreme Court held that enhanced royalty on iron ore cannot be avoided merely because an e-auction agreement predated the royalty revision. The Court clarified that royalty liability arises upon removal or dispatch of minerals, and statutory amendments override contrary contractual arrangements under mining law.
The Supreme Court has referred to a larger Bench a legal question on how personal insolvency proceedings under Part III of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code interact with cheque dishonour prosecutions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The Allahabad High Court held that a Special Court or Magistrate is not obliged to order FIR registration merely because an applicant from the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe community files an application under Section 173(4) of BNSS.
The Supreme Court held that merely mentioning a caste name without intent to insult does not attract the SC/ST Act. It said allegations must show caste-based abuses or that the caste name was hurled as an abuse, in fact.
The Supreme Court has ruled that a widowed daughter-in-law qualifies as a dependant under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. This recognition allows her to legally seek maintenance from the estate left behind by her deceased father-in-law.
The Karnataka High Court ruled that the law against marital cruelty also applies to live-in relationships. It clarified that the term ‘husband’ under Section 498A of the IPC includes partners in relationships with marital traits.
The Delhi High Court observed that proving motive is not essential to uphold a murder charge, noting that motive is not a critical element of an offence as many serious crimes often arise from trivial or insignificant reasons.
Chief Justice of India BR Gavai described the Indian Constitution as a “living document” that adapts to societal changes through amendments. He emphasized its role in empowering marginalized communities and highlighted its transformative force in achieving justice and equality. Gavai’s personal journey illustrates the Constitution’s impact on social justice and representation.
At Oxford Union, CJI Gavai described the Constitution as a “quiet revolution empowering the marginalised,” stressing its transformative strength in ensuring justice, equality, and dignity for those historically denied voice, rights, and representation in society.
Today, On 6th February, A Supreme Court bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan framed key questions in the dispute between the Tamil Nadu government and the Governor over withholding assent to bills. The court is hearing arguments from senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, representing the state. The issue revolves around the Governor’s delay in approving legislation passed by the Assembly. The case highlights ongoing tensions between the state government and the Raj Bhavan.
