The Madhya Pradesh High Court refused to quash a disciplinary inquiry against a civil judge accused of preparing an acquittal judgment before the trial concluded, holding that such allegations strike at the integrity of the judicial institution and warrant a full departmental inquiry.
The Supreme Court set aside NCLT and NCLAT orders in the Essel Infraprojects insolvency case after finding reliance on fake AI-generated judicial precedents. The Court adopted a zero-tolerance approach, holding that citing unverified AI-generated judgments amounts to professional misconduct by advocates.
The Supreme Court expressed concern over threats and attacks targeting retired Bombay High Court judge Justice Gautam Patel and his family, warning that such incidents threaten judicial independence and the administration of justice. The Court observed that fear and intimidation could discourage judges from delivering impartial judgments.
The Supreme Court said that a shocking judicial order can seriously damage public trust in the institution. The bench made the remark while hearing a petition challenging directions asking the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal’s in-charge chairman to step aside.
The Rajasthan High Court began contempt action against litigant Kamal Rathore and driver Anil Suman for secretly recording proceedings. It said such recording interferes with justice and “lowers down the dignity of this Court,” amounting to contempt proceedings.
The Supreme Court has kept in abeyance the Gujarat High Court’s order convicting GHCAA president Yatin Oza for allegedly making scandalous remarks against the state judiciary. The conviction and sentence remain paused while the matter receives further consideration.
The Supreme Court said misuse of PILs has turned them into Private Interest Litigation, Publicity Interest Litigation, Paisa Interest Litigation and Political Interest Litigation. A nine-judge bench made the remark while hearing women’s discrimination cases including Sabarimala Temple.
Today, On 23rd April, Delhi High Court has issued notice to Arvind Kejriwal over alleged illegal publication of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma’s court videos, ordering all intermediaries to remove them, stressing larger institutional interest before the July hearing as the court proceeds.
The Allahabad High Court upheld disciplinary action against a clerk accused of misplacing a judicial file, stressing that such misconduct threatens justice, stating the loss of any judicial record is serious and “required to be handled with iron rod.”
