BREAKING: ‘We Will Never Change Court Procedure for Any Individual’: Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma in Arvind Kejriwal Hearing

Arvind Kejriwal sought to file a rejoinder in his recusal plea, alleging bias, but faced strong objections from SG Tushar Mehta over court procedure. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma allowed it as a written statement, calling it a special indulgence, and postponed the verdict to 4:30 PM.

‘No Judge Left to Hear Govt Cases?’ CBI Slams Arvind Kejriwal’s Recusal Plea in Delhi High Court

The Central Bureau of Investigation opposed Kejriwal’s recusal request, arguing his logic would disqualify judges from hearing any government-related cases. The agency told the Delhi High Court that such claims are legally unsustainable and could disrupt the judicial system.

Delhi High Court Rules: “Unfavourable Order Is Not Bias”: No Case Transfer Just Because You Lose

The Delhi High Court held that an unfavourable judgment cannot be treated as proof of judicial bias.
It clarified that aggrieved parties must seek legal remedies instead of demanding transfer of cases.

“Every Argument of ED-CBI Is Being Accepted”: Arvind Kejriwal Seeks Recusal of Delhi High Court Judge in Excise Case

Kejriwal told the Delhi High Court that Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma has consistently ruled in favour of ED and CBI, raising serious doubts about a fair hearing. He argued that even a “reasonable apprehension of bias” is enough for recusal, citing past judgments and recent court orders.

BREAKING| This Kind Of Quorum Shopping Is Not Ok: CJI Surya Kant On Allegations Against Trial Court Judges

Today, On 17th December, Supreme Court said such quorum shopping is unacceptable, as CJI Surya Kant reacted to allegations against trial court judges. Senior Advocate Indira Jaising flagged last-minute complaints made to High Courts, leaving cases stranded when orders are due imminent.

Prajwal Revanna Case | Observations Cannot be the Foundation of Bias or Prejudging the Issue: SC Slams Alleged Judicial Bias

In the Prajwal Revanna case, the Supreme Court clarified that trial court observations cannot be deemed biased or prejudgment. CJI Surya Kant emphasized that judges must decide cases solely on evidence, maintaining judicial integrity and fairness.

Babri Masjid Was Desecration Remark | Ayodhya Verdict Can Be Contested Through Curative Petition Based on Ex-CJI Chandrachud’s Statement: Prof. G Mohan Gopal

Prof. Mohan Gopal said the Ayodhya judgment can be challenged through a curative petition based on Ex-CJI DY Chandrachud’s remark that the very erection of the Babri Masjid was an act of desecration of a temple.

Allahabad High Court Orders Contempt Action Against Lawyer for Calling Judge “Biased and Dishonest”

Advocate Harish Chandra Shukla faces contempt charges for accusing a judge of bias during a murder case bail hearing. The Allahabad High Court deemed his allegations serious misconduct and initiated criminal contempt proceedings against him. The case will be investigated further, with Justice Siddharth recusing himself from it.

Allahabad High Court: “Litigants Turning Aggressive as Courts Hesitate to Use Contempt Powers”

Justice JJ Munir of the Allahabad High Court expressed concern about aggressive litigants due to the judiciary’s hesitance to invoke contempt powers, respecting free speech rights. The court dismissed baseless allegations against a presiding officer, emphasizing the need for responsible exercise of rights and maintaining the integrity of the judiciary, imposing costs on the petitioner.

Justice Swaminathan Acted “Hastily” in Youtuber Savukku Shankar Case: Madras HC Justice Jayachandran

Justice G. Jayachandran criticized Justice G.R. Swaminathan for bias against State police and hasty decision-making in YouTuber ‘Savukku’ Shankar’s detention case. Swaminathan’s failure to consult his bench partner and refusal to allow the State to file a counter affidavit led Jayachandran to declare Swaminathan’s opinion invalid. Swaminathan’s explanations were deemed inadequate.