The Waqf Amendment Act Challenge will be heard by the Supreme Court on November 4, after petitioners told a Bench led by CJI Surya Kant that waqf properties are changing status with consequences that may be irreversible.
Digital news outlet The News Minute and its Editor-in-Chief Dhanya Rajendran have asked the Supreme Court to let them intervene in the seven-judge Bench reference on the scope of legislative privileges under Article 194(3), arguing that breach-of-privilege proceedings against journalists would have a chilling effect on press freedom, ahead of the hearing from October 6.
Senior journalist Ajit Anjum has sought to intervene in the seven-judge Bench reference on legislative privileges, arguing through AoR Neha Rathi that privileges under Articles 105 and 194 are functional, must be read harmoniously with fundamental rights, and that standards are needed on when fair criticism of legislative proceedings may breach privilege; the Bench begins hearing on October 6.
Journalist Seema Chishti, Editor at The Wire, has sought to intervene in N. Ravi v. Speaker, Legislative Assembly, Chennai, the seven-judge Constitution Bench reference on whether legislative privileges under Article 194(3) can override free speech under Article 19(1)(a), listed for hearing from October 6, arguing that privileges are not absolute.
BJP leader and lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay has approached the Supreme Court challenging key provisions of the Waqf Amendment Act, raising the question, “Do these changes violate equality & justice?” The plea seeks a review of constitutional validity.
Today, On 21st May, The Central government told the Supreme Court that waqf boards handle secular duties, so adding non-Muslims won’t impact their work. It also said Hindu trusts differ, as they don’t allow non-Hindus as members.
Today, On 20th May, Centre Requests Supreme Court to Limit Hearing Scope to Three Specific Issues only while considering interim orders in the ongoing Waqf Amendment Act challenge.
In the Supreme Court, Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Singhvi questioned the new Waqf law, asking, “Who asks for proof of religion?” while arguing that the law unfairly targets religious endowments.
Today, On 20th May, Centre Requests Supreme Court to Limit Hearing Scope to Three Specific Issues only while considering interim orders in the ongoing Waqf Amendment Act challenge.
Today, On 20th May, The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear the Waqf case . During this hearing, the bench may pronounce an interim order, which could impact the ongoing legal proceedings concerning Waqf properties.
