Today, On 15th May, The Supreme Court will hear interim relief pleas challenging the Waqf Amendment Act on May 20. The Centre’s earlier assurance to not implement the Act’s provisions will remain in effect until then.
Today, On 15th May, The Supreme Court will hear interim relief pleas challenging the Waqf Amendment Act on May 20. The Centre’s earlier assurance to not implement the Act’s provisions will remain in effect until then.
Today, On 15th May, CJI Gavai will hear petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act. The case comes after the Centre assured it won’t denotify waqf properties or make new appointments till May.
Today, On 13th May, The Supreme Court has sought a reply from the Uttarakhand government regarding a contempt plea, alleging that the Dehradun administration demolished a dargah registered as waqf property despite the Waqf Amendment stay.
Today, On 5th May, CJI Sanjiv Khanna referred the Waqf Amendment Act case to a Bench led by Justice Gavai ahead of his retirement on May 13. The case requires a lengthy hearing, prompting the shift in proceedings.
Today, On 2nd may, The Supreme Court has refused to hear a fresh petition challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, stating the issue had already been addressed earlier, and no new grounds were presented to reopen the case.
The Uttarakhand Waqf Board has requested the Supreme Court to join a case challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, supporting the law’s constitutional validity. The Board sees itself as a vital participant due to its role in managing Waqf properties, addressing concerns about property genuineness and illegal encroachments while seeking to assist the court.
KOLKATA: The case related to the murder of a young doctor from RG Kar Medical College is currently being heard in the single bench of Justice Tirthankar Ghosh in the Calcutta High Court. However, the victim’s parents have now written a letter to the Chief Justice of India, Sanjiv Khanna, requesting permission to continue the case in the High Court.
The Congress party Today(16th Jan) has petitioned the Supreme Court to defend the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, amid challenges questioning its constitutional validity by BJP leader Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay. The Act aims to preserve the religious status of places of worship as of August 15, 1947, promoting India’s secular fabric.
RJD Member Manoj Kumar Jha filed an intervention petition in the Supreme Court, asserting that the Places of Worship Act, 1991, does not violate constitutional rights and is essential for preserving India’s secular values. The Act protects places of worship as they existed on August 15, 1947, amidst increasing sectarian tensions.
