The Allahabad High Court temporarily transferred custody of a five-year-old girl to her father, observing that she appeared “heavily tutored” and was being used as a “pawn” in her parents’ matrimonial dispute. The interim order was passed in a habeas corpus petition.
The Pune family court granted interim custody of a minor child to his Singapore-based father, observing that the child’s welfare would be better served in his care. The court noted alleged non-compliance with orders and stressed that custody must focus on the child’s best interests.
The Delhi High Court ruled that a parent cannot be denied access to children merely because they reside abroad. The Court granted businessman Amritesh Jatia interim custody of his two children in London during their summer vacation, stating parental time cannot be restricted without justification.
The Delhi High Court upheld interim custody to the mother, stressing that child welfare outweighs parental allegations. It ruled that custody adjudication cannot rely on unproven imputation/accusations or moral imputations against either parent.
The Supreme Court observed that no husband or wife can claim to be independent in a continuing marriage, stressing that matrimony means mutual dependence. The bench asked the estranged couple to reconcile for the sake of their young children.
The Bombay High Court criticized a family court judge’s refusal to urgently hear a father’s plea for temporary custody of his son, who requires open-heart surgery. The High Court emphasized the necessity for compassion in such matters and granted the father’s request, ordering the mother to hand over the child for the procedure.
