The Andhra Pradesh High Court has quashed criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act against a husband’s mother and uncle, holding the charge sheet disclosed only bald allegations with no specific role against them.
The Patna High Court quashed the order taking cognizance under Section 498A IPC against a brother-in-law and a nandosi of a complainant wife, holding that they lived separately, had no connection with her daily domestic affairs, and the allegations of cruelty against them were general and omnibus.
The Supreme Court heard a petition challenging the Hindu Succession Act, which directs a childless widow’s property to her husband’s family. Justice BV Nagarathna highlighted, “under Hindu law, a woman’s gotra changes when she marries.”
The Supreme Court of India quashed a dowry harassment case due to vague accusations against the husband’s family. The bench criticized the trend of naming multiple relatives without clear evidence and emphasized that strong, specific allegations are essential. This judgment reflects the court’s stance against the misuse of dowry laws.
The Supreme Court said that small taunts by in-laws towards a wife are a part of normal family life and do not count as cruelty under Section 498A of the IPC. It also said that courts should be careful while accepting such claims, especially during divorce cases.
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh (Srinagar Bench) has stayed the filing of a chargesheet against the husband’s family in a dowry, assault, and cruelty case, citing lack of evidence, while allowing the investigation against the husband to proceed. The petitioners claim the FIR was filed out of revenge.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition demanding an income tax investigation against in-laws over a Rs 2 crore dowry allegation, stating it was beyond the tax department’s jurisdiction. The court ruled that such family disputes should be resolved through proper legal channels.
The Bombay High Court ruled that keeping a mother’s four-year-old daughter away from her is “cruelty” under IPC Section 498-A. Despite a lower court’s custody order, the child is withheld, causing mental harassment. The court upheld an FIR against the mother’s in-laws, emphasizing ongoing mental injury and contempt of judicial orders.
