The Madras High Court held that an American citizen practicing Hinduism cannot be denied recognition as a Hindu due to foreign citizenship or name. The Court ruled Hinduism requires no mandatory conversion ceremony or certificate, reaffirming the faith’s inclusive and accommodating nature.
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant visited the sacred Kedarnath Temple with his family, offering prayers and participating in traditional rituals at the revered shrine of Lord Shiva. The spiritual visit, set amid the Himalayas, drew attention as the CJI sought blessings during the pilgrimage.
Today, On 14th May, The Supreme Court has now reserved its judgment in the long-pending Sabarimala reference after an intensive 16-day hearing before a nine-judge Bench. Led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, the Bench reconsidered constitutional questions tied to the 2018 ruling.
The Supreme Court of India observed that Hinduism is a way of life, not dependent on rituals. It clarified that a person identifying as Hindu need not visit temples or perform religious ceremonies to still continue being Hindu.
Former Supreme Court judge Justice Rohinton Nariman said Shanti Bhushan was a man of tremendous commitment who quit the BJP because he believed it lacked secularism. He recalled that Bhushan always acted according to principles shaped by his family’s strong secular tradition.
The Supreme Court examined the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, comparing Waqf to Hinduism’s Moksha and addressing its religious significance. Kapil Sibal argued that Waqf is a divine dedication, unlike mere charity, countering the Centre’s claims. The case highlights the essence of charity across religions and its implications for religious endowments.
The Supreme Court has said that changing religion only to get reservation benefits is a misuse of the Constitution. It stated that such actions go against the purpose of helping disadvantaged groups through reservations. The ruling aims to protect the true intention of these constitutional provisions. This judgment sends a strong message to prevent the misuse of reservation benefits.
Today, On 20th December, The Delhi High Court declined to consider a petition that sought to classify the Ram Janmbhoomi Trust as a public authority. The plea argued that the Trust should fall under the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act. However, the court determined that the Trust did not fulfill the criteria required to be recognized as a public authority.
Yesterday, On 28th November, the Kerala High Court ruled that Hinduism does not require elephants for festivals, reinforcing that only essential religious practices are constitutionally protected. The court dismissed the Cochin Devaswom Board’s request for a three-meter distancing rule exemption, emphasizing elephant welfare and asserting that non-essential customs must adhere to legal guidelines.
The Bangladesh government labeled ISKCON a “fundamentalist” group amid rising tensions following the arrest of a Hindu priest, which sparked protests for minority protections. The interim administration faces criticism over its handling of anti-Hindu violence. Diplomatic strains with India increased as it urged protection for Hindu communities, prompting a defensive response from Dhaka.
