The Supreme Court raised a key constitutional question on whether devotees can be denied the right to touch a deity based on birth or status. The issue came up during the ongoing hearing in the Sabarimala Ayyappa Temple case on religious freedom and equality.
The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to limit judicial interference in religious practices and rethink key doctrines like “constitutional morality” and essential religious practices. Its 10-point submission could significantly reshape how courts handle faith, PILs, and religious rights in India.
Allahabad High Court closed contempt proceedings against Bareilly officials over alleged interference with namaz at a private residence. The Court earlier ruled that offering prayers on private property in Uttar Pradesh requires no prior permission.
The Allahabad High Court held that the State must ensure all communities can pray peacefully at places of worship or private property without prior approval, while criticizing local authorities in Sambhal for restricting Muslim worshippers at a mosque.
The Supreme Court has stayed further exhumation of buried bodies of tribal Christians in Chhattisgarh villages and issued notice to the State government. The PIL alleges forced digging up of graves, denial of burial rights, and violation of fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21.
The Allahabad High Court ruled that no government permission is required to hold religious prayer meetings within private premises in Uttar Pradesh. The court said such gatherings are protected under Article 25 of the Constitution, as long as they do not spill into public spaces.
The Tamil Nadu DGP informed the Supreme Court that criminal cases have been registered against protesters for allegedly making caste and religion-based defamatory remarks against Justice G R Swaminathan. The action follows the Madras High Court judge’s order allowing the lighting of Karthigai Deepam on Thirupparankundram hill.
The Supreme Court has listed for January 20 a batch of petitions challenging anti-conversion laws enacted by nine States, including UP, MP and Gujarat. The Court has directed all States to file their counter affidavits within three weeks.
Today, On 25th November, The Supreme Court heard whether religious freedom can be restricted for military discipline after a Christian Army officer was removed for refusing temple pooja. CJI Surya Kant told him, “You seem completely unsuited for the Army,” while dismissing his plea.
The Supreme Court has issued notice on the challenge to the Rajasthan Anti-Conversion Law, asking the State to file its response. The matter will be heard again after the reply is submitted, marking a crucial constitutional review ahead.
