Today, On 5th May, The Supreme Court asked “Are you the chief priest of the country?” while criticising the Indian Young Lawyers Association’s 2006 PIL against restrictions on women aged 10 to 50 entering Kerala’s Sabarimala Temple. The court called the petition amounted to an abuse of process of law.
Today, On 23rd April, The Supreme Court said it respects the views of all distinguished authors and thinkers but cannot rely on information from “WhatsApp University.” The nine-judge Constitution bench made this remark while hearing petitions on discrimination against women and religious freedom issues.
The Supreme Court is examining whether the State can use constitutional morality and Directive Principles to justify laws reforming religious practices. The debate in the Sabarimala reference case may redefine the balance between religious freedom and equality in India.
Supreme Court of India says courts must be careful before questioning religious beliefs of millions in the Sabarimala Temple Entry Case. Bench also warns religion cannot be diluted in the name of social reform and debates scope of judicial review.
The Supreme Court stayed criminal proceedings against a priest booked over remarks on religion, issuing notice to Uttar Pradesh. The bench held trial shall remain stayed while examining the plea challenging FIR and allegations of hurting religious sentiments.
The Supreme Court referred anti-conversion law challenges to a larger Bench, examining Rajasthan’s 2025 statute and similar State laws. The case raises far-reaching constitutional questions on equality, liberty, speech, and religious freedom under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 25.
