The Supreme Court will hear Punjab’s plea against the Governor referring two bills to the President. SG Tushar Mehta said, “Since this involves the same constitutional questions, let all such matters be heard together before the Constitution Bench,” but Singhvi objected.
Five prominent petitioners have urged Chief Justice B.R. Gavai to establish a Supreme Court bench to address the restoration of Jammu & Kashmir’s statehood, claiming delays threaten federalism and constitutional integrity. They argue that the removal of statehood is unconstitutional and call for immediate action to restore civil and political rights in the region.
Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai emphasized Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s vision for a unified India under a single Constitution, especially during the discussion of Article 370’s revocation. At an event marking the inauguration of Constitution Preamble Park, Gavai stressed that unity and constitutional strength are essential for overcoming national challenges, echoing Ambedkar’s beliefs.
Tamil Nadu has approached the Supreme Court, alleging that the Central government is unlawfully withholding Rs.2,291.30 crore in education funds to coerce compliance with the disputed National Education Policy 2020. The state argues this practice violates constitutional rights and federalism, demanding immediate fund release under the Samagra Shiksha Scheme.
Sibal explained that even though the Basic Structure Doctrine, laid down in the historic Kesavananda Bharati case, is still in place, it can be weakened through normal laws passed by the legislature. On Monday, Senior Advocate and President of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), Kapil Sibal, made a serious statement regarding the Indian Constitution. […]
On April 8, 2025, the Supreme Court of India clarified the roles of the President and Governor regarding State Bills, emphasizing judicial review of presidential actions under Article 201. The Court stated the President must decide on bills within three months and cannot use a pocket veto, demanding clear reasons for withholding assent.
NEW DELHI: Former Chief Justice of India, U.U. Lalit, will be one of the key persons to speak before the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) set up to review the One Nation One Election (ONOE) Bill. Along with him, four other prominent figures will also give their views in a meeting scheduled for February 25.
Supreme Court judge Justice B.V. Nagarathna criticized the overstepping of roles by governors in India and their inactivity, reflecting poorly on the constitutional position of the governor. She emphasized the importance of fraternity and advocated for a focus on federalism, fundamental rights, and principled governance to strengthen Indian constitutionalism. She is set to become the Chief Justice of India in September 2027.
The Delhi excise policy case, initiated in November 2021 to restructure the liquor trade, faced allegations of corruption and irregularities. Key events included the CBI probe, high-profile arrests, and legal battles involving Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. The case drew attention for its impact on political and legal proceedings in India.