The Supreme Court of India reaffirmed the abrogation of Article 370, dismissing all review petitions. The ruling validates the central government’s action and solidifies Jammu and Kashmir’s integration into the Indian Union. The decision has far-reaching implications and signifies a crucial development in India’s constitutional and political landscape.
Soli J. Sorabjee, an eminent jurist, advocated the Basic Structure Doctrine to protect federalism and judiciary independence. Justice Surya Kant highlighted Sorabjee’s contributions in a memorial lecture, emphasizing the doctrine’s role in safeguarding fundamental principles. He also discussed the concept of dharma and its importance in ensuring judicial independence and reinforcing human rights.
The Supreme Court is set to hear Arvind Kejriwal’s plea against possible arrest on Monday, April 29th. The plea is related to a defamation case filed by a former DDA vice-chairman. Kejriwal argues that his arrest undermines democracy and accuses the ED of misusing its power for political purposes. The controversy centers on alleged corruption in Delhi’s excise policy.
Today (1st April) The Supreme Court’s nine-judge bench is currently considering the jurisdictional control over the regulation of industrial alcohol by state and Union governments. Arguments have been presented by Senior Advocates Dinesh Dwivedi and Arvind Datar, emphasizing the balance of power between the Union and state governments as defined in the Constitution. The bench aims to conclude hearings by April 9, 2024.
Today (3rd April): The Tamil Nadu government has accused the Central government of withholding Rs. 37,000 crore allocated for flood relief. The state argues that the delay in fund release hinders disaster management efforts and violates fundamental rights. They have filed a plea in the Supreme Court, seeking the allocation of these funds and highlighting the unequal treatment compared to other states.
Retired Supreme Court Justice S. Ravindra Bhat Today highlighted the Supreme Court’s failure to address federalism concerns in the Article 370 judgment. He also emphasized the need for adapting norms to technological advancements. Reflecting on revisiting established norms, he stated it is essential to make the Constitution responsive and relevant in the 21st century.
