The Andhra Pradesh High Court has held that a mother is a legal heir and family member of her deceased son even if he was married, and cannot be denied a Family Member Certificate on the ground that only his wife and children can be treated as family members. Setting aside a Tahsildar’s rejection, the Court directed the certificate to be issued to the mother, along with the names of other family members if any, and held that she cannot be made to wait until the widow applies.
The Madras High Court ruled that a stepson is not entitled to family pension under the Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993. The Court held that family pension is a statutory benefit available only to persons falling within the Rules’ definition of “family,” unlike gratuity nominations.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that a notarized divorce agreement alone cannot legally dissolve a marriage. Dismissing a pension claim by a deceased government employee’s alleged second husband, the Court held that only a court-issued divorce decree can legally end a marriage.
The Madras High Court has ruled that the second wife of a retired government employee cannot claim his family pension. The court held the marriage was legally void, as it took place while the first wife was still alive.
The Delhi High Court has upheld rules allowing a childless widow of a deceased CRPF jawan to continue receiving family pension even after remarriage. The Court said the policy supports widows financially and encourages remarriage, and is neither arbitrary nor unconstitutional.
The Delhi High Court directed the Centre to consider a retired employee’s plea to include his live-in partner of forty years and their children in the Pension Payment Order. Justices Navin Chawla and Madhu Jain said denial was mistaken.
The Calcutta High Court ruled that a divorced daughter may claim family pension if divorce proceedings began during the pensioner’s lifetime, even when the decree came later. A Division Bench dismissed the Union’s plea, upholding the CAT Kolkata decision.
A widow wins her 24-year-long battle as Rajasthan High Court orders the government to pay family pension, death gratuity, and interest for her late husband’s temporary government service. Court rules delay cannot deny rightful benefits to dependents.
The Bombay High Court held that mere allegation of adultery cannot deny a wife family pension under MCSR 1982, ensuring widow and children’s pensionary rights remain protected.
The Madras High Court mandated the expedited family pension for the disabled daughter of a former Acting Chief Justice, emphasizing that pensions are legal rights, not charity. The court criticized bureaucratic delays and affirmed that only a medical certificate is needed to process such claims, especially for individuals with disabilities.
