• Sun. Sep 13th, 2026
    • '

    Tag: Dy Chandrachud

    Sabarimala Reference Row| We Respect Authors And Thinkers, But Cannot Rely on WhatsApp University: Supreme Court
    Sabarimala Reference Row| We Respect Authors And Thinkers, But Cannot Rely on WhatsApp University: Supreme Court
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Sabarimala Reference Row| We Respect Authors And Thinkers, But Cannot Rely on WhatsApp University: Supreme Court

    Today, On 23rd April, The Supreme Court said it respects the views of all distinguished authors and thinkers but cannot rely on information from “WhatsApp University.” The nine-judge Constitution bench made this remark while hearing petitions on discrimination against women and religious freedom issues.

    author
    Sabarimala Row: “Can Constitutional Morality Justify Social Reform Laws?”: Supreme Court Raises Big Question on Religious Freedom
    Sabarimala Row: “Can Constitutional Morality Justify Social Reform Laws?”: Supreme Court Raises Big Question on Religious Freedom
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Sabarimala Row: “Can Constitutional Morality Justify Social Reform Laws?”: Supreme Court Raises Big Question on Religious Freedom

    The Supreme Court is examining whether the State can use constitutional morality and Directive Principles to justify laws reforming religious practices. The debate in the Sabarimala reference case may redefine the balance between religious freedom and equality in India.

    author
    ‘No Eviction Without Lease Clause’: Supreme Court of India Shields Govt Officers in Sujan Singh Park Case
    ‘No Eviction Without Lease Clause’: Supreme Court of India Shields Govt Officers in Sujan Singh Park Case
    Supreme Court

    ‘No Eviction Without Lease Clause’: Supreme Court of India Shields Govt Officers in Sujan Singh Park Case

    The Supreme Court of India quashed the eviction of government officers from Sujan Singh Park flats near Khan Market, ruling rent law doesn’t apply. It held eviction cannot happen without a clear clause in the lease, limiting the landlord’s remedy to rent recovery only.

    author
    Supreme Court Slams Mamata Banerjee Over ED Probe Interference: “Cannot Put Democracy in Peril”
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Supreme Court Slams Mamata Banerjee Over ED Probe Interference: “Cannot Put Democracy in Peril”

    The Supreme Court of India criticised Mamata Banerjee for allegedly interfering in an Enforcement Directorate probe, calling it a threat to democracy. The Court said a Chief Minister cannot disrupt investigations and warned against actions that put the democratic system at risk.

    author
    Yasin Malik Linked to Pakistan’s Top Leadership? NIA Tells Delhi High Court About Alleged Secession Plot
    Yasin Malik Linked to Pakistan’s Top Leadership? NIA Tells Delhi High Court About Alleged Secession Plot
    High CourtHeadlines

    Yasin Malik Linked to Pakistan’s Top Leadership? NIA Tells Delhi High Court About Alleged Secession Plot

    The National Investigation Agency claimed that Yasin Malik used contacts with Pakistan’s PM and President to push Kashmir’s secession agenda. The High Court will now hear arguments on whether his life sentence in the terror funding case should be increased.

    author
    “Jail Rights Can’t Be Disabled”: Supreme Court of India Expands Prison Panel’s Role to Protect Disabled Inmates
    “Jail Rights Can’t Be Disabled”: Supreme Court of India Expands Prison Panel’s Role to Protect Disabled Inmates
    Supreme Court

    “Jail Rights Can’t Be Disabled”: Supreme Court of India Expands Prison Panel’s Role to Protect Disabled Inmates

    The Supreme Court has widened the mandate of a prison reforms panel to ensure proper implementation of rights for prisoners with disabilities across India. The move aims to bring accountability, accessibility, and dignity within the prison system.

    author
    Kangana Ranaut Seeks Delay in Court Verdict Over Farmers’ Protest Remarks Case in Agra
    Other CourtsLatest news

    Kangana Ranaut Seeks Delay in Court Verdict Over Farmers’ Protest Remarks Case in Agra

    Kangana Ranaut has moved an Agra MP-MLA court requesting postponement of the April 30 verdict in a case linked to her remarks on the farmers’ protest. Her plea claims the complainant got “undue opportunity” and seeks equal time for the defence before judgment.

    author
    NIA Act Under Fire: Supreme Court of India Seeks Centre’s Reply on Constitutional Challenge
    NIA Act Under Fire: Supreme Court of India Seeks Centre’s Reply on Constitutional Challenge
    Supreme Court

    NIA Act Under Fire: Supreme Court of India Seeks Centre’s Reply on Constitutional Challenge

    The Supreme Court of India has issued notice to the Centre on a plea questioning the validity of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008. The case raises major concerns about federal powers, NIA authority, and constitutional rights across India.

    author
    ‘No Need to Attack Judicial Review’: CJI Surya Kant Pushes Back as Sai Deepak Defends Religious Autonomy in Sabarimala Hearing
    ‘No Need to Attack Judicial Review’: CJI Surya Kant Pushes Back as Sai Deepak Defends Religious Autonomy in Sabarimala Hearing
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    ‘No Need to Attack Judicial Review’: CJI Surya Kant Pushes Back as Sai Deepak Defends Religious Autonomy in Sabarimala Hearing

    The Supreme Court of India bench led by Surya Kant questioned arguments by J. Sai Deepak against judicial review of codified religious practices. The CJI stressed that once the State acts, courts cannot be completely excluded from reviewing its actions, even in matters of faith.

    author
    “Lie Repeated 1000 Times Doesn’t Become Truth”: 9 Explosive Reasons Why Delhi HC Judge Refused to Step Aside in Kejriwal Case
    “Lie Repeated 1000 Times Doesn’t Become Truth”: 9 Explosive Reasons Why Delhi HC Judge Refused to Step Aside in Kejriwal Case
    High CourtHeadlines

    “Lie Repeated 1000 Times Doesn’t Become Truth”: 9 Explosive Reasons Why Delhi HC Judge Refused to Step Aside in Kejriwal Case

    Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma rejected recusal pleas, saying allegations lacked proof and could damage judicial independence. The Delhi High Court ruled that courts cannot be influenced by narratives, politics, or “forum shopping.”

    author