A Delhi family court has ruled that a divorced woman proven to be living in adultery is not entitled to maintenance under Section 125(4) CrPC. The court relied on a DNA test and prior divorce judgment to dismiss her plea.
The Allahabad High Court ruled that a man denying paternity must undergo a DNA test or pay child maintenance. Emphasizing the children’s rights, the court highlighted the importance of securing their financial support and legal status. The ruling addressed the significance of DNA testing in resolving paternity disputes and emphasized the children’s best interests.
Today (26th April): A Mumbai court rejected the plea for a DNA test on BJP candidate Ravi Kishan, accused of fathering a woman’s daughter. The woman, Aparna Soni, claims Ravi Kishan is the father of her 25-year-old daughter, Shinova, and seeks a paternity test. Ravi Kishan denies the allegations, and his wife has filed an FIR against the woman and her family.
A 25-year-old woman from Mumbai filed a civil suit against BJP’s Gorakhpur MP Ravi Kishan, claiming he is her biological father. She seeks a DNA test, legal recognition, and an injunction against Kishan denying paternity. Legal action includes quashing an FIR and challenging its jurisdiction. The case unfolds amidst family disputes with allegations and counterclaims.
The Kerala High Court ruled that Registrars cannot delay issuing birth certificates based on unfounded suspicions or demand DNA testing without valid reasons. The court emphasized the Registrar’s duty to process applications promptly and fairly, ensuring individuals’ rights are safeguarded. The judgment reinforces the importance of adherence to established procedures and upholding legal certainty.
