The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that a negative DNA match is not a clean chit for an accused, refusing bail in a POCSO case and ordering a special team to trace the biological father of the foetus. Jabalpur: The Madhya Pradesh High Court has refused bail to a man accused of sexually assaulting […]
The Karnataka High Court is hearing a plea seeking registration of FIRs in 74 unnatural death cases around Dharmasthala, with the petitioner arguing that the SIT, a notified police station, cannot wait for the DGP to transfer cases.
Sikkim child rape-murder case: the Supreme Court acquitted a man serving life imprisonment, holding that the last-seen evidence was doubtful, the recovery was from an open spot and the DNA report showed the recovered bones were of male origin.
Himachal double murder acquittal upheld: the Supreme Court dismissed the State’s appeal, finding the last-seen witnesses unreliable, the DNA match inconclusive and the failure to collect mobile tower locations a serious investigational lapse.
Kokrajhar rape-murder: The Gauhati High Court upheld the conviction of three men for the 2021 gang rape and murder of two minor girls in Kokrajhar, relying on DNA evidence, but commuted their death sentence to life imprisonment for the rest of their natural lives without remission.
The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court order directing a DNA test, ruling that a child’s right to know biological parentage outweighs an adult’s concern over reputation. The Court observed that truth cannot be suppressed merely because it causes personal discomfort.
The Allahabad High Court expressed concern over bail being granted in rape and murder cases due to shortcomings in Uttar Pradesh’s forensic infrastructure, urging the State to modernize FSL facilities with advanced equipment and adequate staff. The Court directed that its order be placed before Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath.
The Supreme Court acquitted a man on death row citing faulty DNA evidence. It issued strict nationwide guidelines on DNA collection, storage, and chain of custody.
The Calcutta High Court declined to discharge a man in a rape case, asserting that a DNA report, despite concluding he wasn’t the biological father of the victim’s child, isn’t conclusive evidence to establish rape.
The Delhi High Court acquitted four individuals accused in a gang rape case due to inconsistencies in the victim’s statement under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court criticized the police for a shoddy investigation and emphasized the lack of crucial evidence. The appeal was filed by the convicted men, and they were acquitted due to insufficient material to prove the prosecution’s case.
