The Supreme Court of India held that granting probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, does not erase the stigma of conviction. The Court said probation only substitutes the sentence, and the conviction remains, allowing departmental disciplinary action.
The Delhi High Court refused to interfere with the CAT’s order staying departmental proceedings against IRS officer Sameer Wankhede linked to the Aryan Khan drug case. The Court instead directed the tribunal to decide Wankhede’s challenge to the charge memo expeditiously within a fixed timeline.
The Supreme Court set aside High Court orders and upheld the dismissal of a CISF constable for contracting a second marriage, stressing that courts cannot act as appellate authorities in disciplinary matters. Invoking “dura lex sed lex”, the Court held that hardship cannot override clear statutory rules governing disciplined forces.
The Supreme Court expressed concern over a growing trend of judges issuing multiple orders just before retirement, questioning judicial discipline. Calling it an unfortunate trend, the Court likened last-minute orders to a batter hitting sixes in final over.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR against a private hospital and a doctor in a medical negligence case, holding that the surgical mop left during a C-section was unintentional and bereft of the necessary mens rea to face criminal trial.
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a Flight Cadet accused of stealing HHMs, calling the punishment disproportionate and irrational. The Court stressed that his actions occurred during severe mental disturbance and cannot define his fitness to be an officer.
Today, On 25th November, The Supreme Court heard whether religious freedom can be restricted for military discipline after a Christian Army officer was removed for refusing temple pooja. CJI Surya Kant told him, “You seem completely unsuited for the Army,” while dismissing his plea.
The Bar Council of India has struck off a Delhi advocate after confirming he enrolled using forged documents. The BCI has also uncovered suspected collusion involving touts, insiders and long-serving BCD staff.
The Delhi High Court criticised the Bar Council of India’s rules allowing suspension of foreign law firms based only on a preliminary inquiry, calling them “drastic” and unfair. The Court warned that the BCI must amend the rules or the bench will read them down.
The Delhi High Court has directed the Vigilance Department to quickly complete its inquiry against Tihar Jail officials accused of running an extortion racket. The Court criticised the government’s “lackadaisical approach” and demanded progress reports by January 2026.
