On Thursday(12th Sept), the Punjab and Haryana High Court stated that disciplinary action for facilitating gangster Lawrence Bishnoi’s interview in custody should include higher-ranking officers, not just lower-ranking ones. This followed the Punjab government’s commitment to initiate proceedings against the involved officers.
The Supreme Court today seeks Bar Council of India’s response to JustDial’s appeal against a Madras High Court ruling on lawyer advertisements. The Court emphasized compliance with Advocates Act and BCI regulations. JustDial argued for its role as a directory service. BCI had issued removal notice to comply with the High Court’s order. Supreme Court awaits BCI’s response.
The Delhi High Court today reserved its decision on the legality of Bibhav Kumar’s arrest, a close aide of Arvind Kejriwal, following arguments from both sides. Senior Advocate N Hariharan argued unlawfulness, citing lack of prior notice. Meanwhile, the Delhi Police defended the arrest, alleging evidence tampering. The case’s political implications add complexity to the situation.
New Delhi: Recently, The Supreme Court upheld the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal’s order on disciplinary action against auditors, strengthening the National Financial Reporting Authority’s (NFRA) authority. The case involved a penalty and practice bar against an auditor due to lapses in DHFL’s audit. This decision sets a precedent for NFRA’s disciplinary measures in similar cases.
NEW DELHI: Today (10th April): The Supreme Court of India intervened in a dispute over a Christian prayer event in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, allowing the event to proceed despite concerns raised by the district administration and Hindu organizations. Chennai-based preacher Dr. Paul Dhinakaran addressed 8,000 attendees at the event. The court recognized the religious intent but also considered the administration’s concerns.
Today (10th April): The Supreme Court stayed the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s order restricting Bar Association office bearers from appearing before any court for one month. The Court emphasized the importance of responsible conduct among lawyers. This decision provides temporary relief and the matter will be further examined during the proceedings.
A Delhi court criticized the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for flawed investigation in a money laundering case. The court summoned the Investigating Officer to explain why penal and disciplinary action should not be recommended. Special Judge Farrukh noted the failure to conduct a fair investigation, as crucial evidence was withheld. The court issued notices for the individuals implicated in the illegal activities.
Today (27th March) A formal complaint has been lodged with the Delhi High Court against Aam Aadmi Party’s legal cell for organizing protests within court premises following Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s arrest. Advocate Vaibhav Singh seeks to halt the demonstrations and urges investigation into potential professional misconduct by the Bar Councils of India and Delhi. The complaint specifically targets the AAP’s Legal Cell’s Vice-Chairman, Sanjiv Nasiar, for making false allegations and using court spaces for political purposes, calling for appropriate penalties.
Today (13th March): The Bombay High Court upheld a penalty on a CISF officer for a late-night request for a lemon at a woman’s door, deeming his actions preposterous and unbecoming of an officer. The officer’s claim of a medical emergency was dismissed, and the penalty includes a salary reduction and freeze on increments for three years.
![[Swati Maliwal Assault Case] Delhi HC Reserves order on Bibhav Kumar's Plea Challenging his "Illegal Arrest"](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Screenshot-2024-06-15-140646.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
![[Christian Prayer Meet] SC Permits to Hold the Prayer Meeting in Indore, Set Aside MP HC Order](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/MicrosoftTeams-image-19.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
