Six months of residual service is the line the Prakash Singh directions draw for a police chief’s appointment. The Supreme Court has said the Jharkhand DGP Appointment Rule, which allows an appointment despite less than six months of service left, prima facie falls on the wrong side of it. New Delhi: Hearing an application by […]
The Centre has moved the Supreme Court alleging that Jharkhand acted in complete defiance of the Prakash Singh directions on DGP appointments, and has sought early listing of its application. New Delhi: The Union of India has moved the Supreme Court against the State of Jharkhand in the Prakash Singh police reforms matter, alleging that […]
Today, On 5th February, The Supreme Court criticised States for appointing acting police chiefs instead of sending timely DGP recommendations to the UPSC. It said delays harmed senior officers’ careers and asked the UPSC to approach the Court when States stall appointments.
The Union Public Service Commission returned West Bengal’s proposal for appointing a Director General of Police, intensifying friction between the state government and the Centre. Citing delays, the UPSC urged the Trinamool led administration to approach the Supreme Court urgently.
Today, On 18th August, In the DGP appointments case, the Supreme Court said contempt cannot be used to settle political disputes and clarified that the proper forum is CAT, stressing that PIL jurisdiction is meant only to protect socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds.
The Supreme Court will hear multiple petitions challenging Jharkhand DGP Anurag Gupta’s appointment for alleged violation of SC guidelines. Opposition leader Babulal Marandi and others have questioned the legality of the move.
The Supreme Court of India is set to hear petitions in May regarding the enforcement of its 2006 judgment aimed at police reforms, including separating investigation and law enforcement roles and instituting merit-based DGP appointments. Advocacy groups express concerns over state governments’ non-compliance, prompting the court to initiate contempt proceedings.
