Transferred Judge Returns to Hear 2020 Delhi Riots UAPA Conspiracy Case from July 1

Judge Sameer Bajpai will resume hearing the 2020 Delhi riots UAPA trial starting July 1, following the Delhi High Court’s order. His return aims to ensure continuity in the high-profile case amidst serious allegations of a premeditated conspiracy behind the violence, which resulted in over 50 deaths and extensive injuries.

Delhi Riots Conspiracy Case: Karkardooma Court Reschedules Hearing on Charges to July 2

Delhi’s Karkardooma Court has rescheduled the hearing on framing of charges in the larger conspiracy case linked to the 2020 Delhi riots. The matter will now be heard on July 2, 2025.

Delhi High Court Tired of Delay in Delhi Riots Bail Cases: “Please End, Please End. On Every Date We Say This”

The Delhi High Court Today (May 27) expressed frustration over the never-ending arguments in Delhi Riots bail hearings. The judges urged quicker progress, as cases remain pending for over three years.

2020 Delhi Riots || “Needed to Take Care of His Ailing Father”: Accused Shahrukh Pathan Gets 15 Days Interim Bail

Yesterday, On 7th March, The man who pointed a gun at a cop during the 2020 Delhi riots has been granted 15 days’ interim bail. A court approved his temporary release under specific conditions. His case remains under legal proceedings. The incident was a key moment during the riots.

[BREAKING] Supreme Court Gives Split Verdict on Tahir Hussain’s Bail Plea for Election Campaign Amid 2020 Delhi Riots Case

The Supreme Court has issued a split verdict on whether Tahir Hussain, a former AAP councillor facing serious allegations, should be granted interim bail to campaign in the Delhi Assembly elections. Justice Mithal opposed the plea citing potential misuse of bail, while Justice Amanullah supported it with conditions, highlighting delays in Hussain’s trial. The case will be referred for further review.

Tahir Hussain’s Bail Plea || “Why No Bail in One Case When Granted in Nine Similar Cases?”: Supreme Court

Today, On 21st January, The Supreme Court raised questions about denying bail to Tahir Hussain in one case, despite bail being granted in nine similar cases. Hussain is accused in the murder of Intelligence Bureau (IB) officer Ankit Sharma, who was killed during the February 2020 riots in Delhi. The court emphasized the need for consistency in granting bail. This case is a key focus in the ongoing investigation into the riots.

Tahir Hussain’s Bail Plea | ‘Such Persons Should Be Barred From Contesting Elections’: Supreme Court

Today, On 20th January, The Supreme Court stated that individuals like Tahir Hussain should be disqualified from contesting elections. This comment came during a hearing of Hussain’s plea. The Court emphasized the importance of ensuring that persons with certain backgrounds are prevented from entering the political arena. The statement raises concerns about eligibility and public accountability in politics.

‘No Calls, No Chats, No Violence’: Sharjeel Imam Appeals for Bail in 2020 Delhi Riots Case

Student activist Sharjeel Imam, accused of involvement in the 2020 Delhi riots, insists he has no ties to alleged co-conspirators and advocates for non-violence. His lawyer claims a lack of evidence against him and highlights Imam’s peaceful protest involvement. The court will hear his bail plea on December 20.

“Such Actions on Social Media Could Incite Unrest Between Different Communities”: Delhi Police Opposes Nadeem Khan’s Plea

Delhi Police opposed Nadeem Khan’s plea, citing risks to communal harmony due to his social media actions. They argue he spreads misleading narratives that instigate unrest and threaten unity. The Delhi High Court granted him interim protection from arrest while emphasizing cooperation in the investigation, highlighting the importance of maintaining national harmony.

[2020 Delhi Riots] “No Occasion for Her to Be Inside – Gulfisha, Khalid Saifi seek bail in HC in UAPA case

Student activist Gulfisha Fatima and others sought bail in the Delhi High Court regarding the February 2020 riots. They argue their four-year custody under UAPA and trial delays warrant release. The court will hear their pleas alongside others in December, as they maintain innocence amid claims of a larger conspiracy linked to the riots.