The Supreme Court has issued a split verdict on whether Tahir Hussain, a former AAP councillor facing serious allegations, should be granted interim bail to campaign in the Delhi Assembly elections. Justice Mithal opposed the plea citing potential misuse of bail, while Justice Amanullah supported it with conditions, highlighting delays in Hussain’s trial. The case will be referred for further review.
Today, On 21st January, The Supreme Court raised questions about denying bail to Tahir Hussain in one case, despite bail being granted in nine similar cases. Hussain is accused in the murder of Intelligence Bureau (IB) officer Ankit Sharma, who was killed during the February 2020 riots in Delhi. The court emphasized the need for consistency in granting bail. This case is a key focus in the ongoing investigation into the riots.
Today, On 20th January, The Supreme Court stated that individuals like Tahir Hussain should be disqualified from contesting elections. This comment came during a hearing of Hussain’s plea. The Court emphasized the importance of ensuring that persons with certain backgrounds are prevented from entering the political arena. The statement raises concerns about eligibility and public accountability in politics.
Student activist Sharjeel Imam, accused of involvement in the 2020 Delhi riots, insists he has no ties to alleged co-conspirators and advocates for non-violence. His lawyer claims a lack of evidence against him and highlights Imam’s peaceful protest involvement. The court will hear his bail plea on December 20.
Delhi Police opposed Nadeem Khan’s plea, citing risks to communal harmony due to his social media actions. They argue he spreads misleading narratives that instigate unrest and threaten unity. The Delhi High Court granted him interim protection from arrest while emphasizing cooperation in the investigation, highlighting the importance of maintaining national harmony.
Student activist Gulfisha Fatima and others sought bail in the Delhi High Court regarding the February 2020 riots. They argue their four-year custody under UAPA and trial delays warrant release. The court will hear their pleas alongside others in December, as they maintain innocence amid claims of a larger conspiracy linked to the riots.
The Delhi High Court will hear Umar Khalid’s bail plea regarding a UAPA case related to the 2020 Delhi riots. Co-accused Sharjeel Imam, Gulfisha Fatima, and Khalid Saifi will also have their pleas reviewed. Khalid has been denied bail multiple times, with previous appeals dismissed as lacking merit. The court noted credible allegations against him.
A petition filed by advocate Gopal Bansal in the Delhi High Court raises concerns about mobile apps sharing sensitive vehicle owner information with third parties, posing risks to privacy and security. The plea calls for stricter regulations to prevent data misuse and highlights past incidents of data exploitation during communal riots.
![[BREAKING] 'Larger Conspiracy of Delhi Riots Case': Delhi High Court Re-Notified the Bail Plea of Umar Khalid for Hearing on October 7](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-374.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court Today (Aug 29) rescheduled the hearing of Umar Khalid’s bail plea in connection with the larger conspiracy of the Delhi riots case to October 7. Umar Khalid, who has been accused under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) for his alleged involvement in the 2020 Delhi riots, had his bail plea re-notified for this new date.
Today, On 23rd July, The Delhi High Court transferred the investigation of a youth’s death during the North East Delhi riots to the CBI due to suspicions of police bias. The move aims to ensure a thorough and impartial probe into serious allegations of communal bias. The court criticized the Delhi Police’s investigation, emphasizing the need for a fair process.