A Bengaluru court took cognizance of a criminal defamation complaint against Karnataka Home Minister Priyank Kharge and Youth Congress leader Mohammed Nalapad over alleged RSS remarks. The court found sufficient grounds under Section 356 of BNS and issued summons for appearance on July 21, 2026.
Satyaki Savarkar told a Pune court that Vinayak Damodar Savarkar’s mercy petitions to the British government did not affect the “Veer” title given by the public. The statement came during a defamation case against Rahul Gandhi over remarks made in London in 2023.
The Supreme Court urged IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri and IPS officer D Roopa Moudgil to resolve their long-running dispute through mediation, observing that continued litigation was harming both careers. The Court made the remarks while hearing Sindhuri’s challenge to criminal defamation proceedings.
The Kerala High Court dismissed a quashing plea by editors of the Vellinakshathram website, holding that republishing defamatory statements causing reputational harm can attract criminal liability under Sections 499 and 500 IPC, refusing to quash proceedings sought under Section 482 CrPC.
An MP-MLA court in Hathras has sought Rahul Gandhi’s response on a defamation complaint filed by three men acquitted in the 2020 Hathras gangrape case. The court issued notice after receiving an inquiry report and fixed the next hearing for February 7, 2026.
The Allahabad High Court quashed the forgery case against shooter Vartika Singh, ruling she was victim of impersonation scam. The Court noted the scam targeted her for exploitation, confirming that criminal proceedings could not continue against someone misled.
The Delhi High Court issued a notice to AAP leaders Atishi and Sanjay Singh in a defamation case filed by Congress leader Sandeep Dikshit. Justice Ravinder Dudeja directed them to submit their response by December 4 challenging the trial court’s decision.
A Delhi court dismissed a woman’s defamation complaint against her husband, who had accused her of cruelty and adultery in a divorce petition. The court emphasized that defamation requires intention to harm reputation. It also cautioned against using the criminal justice system for personal disputes, reinforcing that legal proceedings should not be misused.
According to the complaint, Karnail Singh falsely claimed that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) had recovered 37 kilograms of gold from Jain’s house and that he owned 1,100 acres of land. NEW DELHI: On Saturday, Delhi’s Rouse Avenue Court ruled on the questions of jurisdiction and maintainability in the defamation case filed by former Delhi Minister […]
New Delhi, January 27: A defamation complaint filed by former Congress MP Sandeep Dikshit against Delhi Chief Minister (CM) Atishi and AAP MP Sanjay Singh has been scheduled for pre-cognizance arguments in the Rouse Avenue Court.
