• Mon. May 11th, 2026
    • '

    Tag: custodial interrogation

    Why Did the Supreme Court Take Assam CM Himanta Sarma’s Remarks So Seriously While Granting Bail to Pawan Khera? : Analysis
    Why Did the Supreme Court Take Assam CM Himanta Sarma’s Remarks So Seriously While Granting Bail to Pawan Khera? : Analysis
    Legal updatesHeadlines

    Why Did the Supreme Court Take Assam CM Himanta Sarma’s Remarks So Seriously While Granting Bail to Pawan Khera? : Analysis

    The Supreme Court’s order in Pawan Khera v. State of Assam is not just another anticipatory bail order it is a quiet but firm reminder that the criminal process cannot be allowed to become a vehicle of political rivalry. The Chief Minister’s own words, the Court found, were a part of the record it could not ignore.

    author
    “Not a Flight Risk, But Bail Denied”: Gauhati High Court Deals Major Blow to Pawan Khera
    “Not a Flight Risk, But Bail Denied”: Gauhati High Court Deals Major Blow to Pawan Khera
    High CourtLatest news

    “Not a Flight Risk, But Bail Denied”: Gauhati High Court Deals Major Blow to Pawan Khera

    Gauhati High Court rejected Pawan Khera’s anticipatory bail, saying the case involves serious charges beyond defamation. The court also stressed the need for custodial interrogation to verify documents and uncover the full conspiracy.

    author
    Ernakulam Court Grants Three Day Police Custody Of Filmmaker Ranjith Balakrishnan In Sexual Harassment Allegation Case
    Ernakulam Court Grants Three Day Police Custody Of Filmmaker Ranjith Balakrishnan In Sexual Harassment Allegation Case
    Other CourtsLatest news

    Ernakulam Court Grants Three Day Police Custody Of Filmmaker Ranjith Balakrishnan In Sexual Harassment Allegation Case

    A magistrate court in Ernakulam granted police three days’ custody of filmmaker Ranjith Balakrishnan in a sexual harassment case. The court allowed custodial interrogation, directing he remain with police for three days including April five and six.

    author
    AI Impact Summit 2026 Row: Delhi Court Says ‘Shirtless’ Protest Was “Blatant Assault on Public Order”, Not Legitimate Dissent
    AI Impact Summit 2026 Row: Delhi Court Says ‘Shirtless’ Protest Was “Blatant Assault on Public Order”, Not Legitimate Dissent
    Other CourtsHeadlines

    AI Impact Summit 2026 Row: Delhi Court Says ‘Shirtless’ Protest Was “Blatant Assault on Public Order”, Not Legitimate Dissent

    A Delhi court granted five days’ police custody to four IYC workers arrested for protesting inside Bharat Mandapam during the AI Impact Summit 2026. The court ruled that their actions were not protected dissent but a serious threat to public order and India’s diplomatic image.

    author
    Rs 640 Crore Cyber Scam Shock: Supreme Court Denies Anticipatory Bail to CA in ED Money Laundering Probe
    Rs 640 Crore Cyber Scam Shock: Supreme Court Denies Anticipatory Bail to CA in ED Money Laundering Probe
    Supreme Court

    Rs 640 Crore Cyber Scam Shock: Supreme Court Denies Anticipatory Bail to CA in ED Money Laundering Probe

    The Supreme Court refused pre-arrest bail to a chartered accountant accused in a massive ₹640 crore cyber fraud and money laundering case. Upholding the Delhi High Court’s order, the Court directed the accused to surrender within 10 days, backing the ED’s demand for custodial interrogation.

    author
    Caste-Based Abuse Over Phone Does Not Attract SC/ST Act: Calcutta High Court
    Caste-Based Abuse Over Phone Does Not Attract SC/ST Act: Calcutta High Court
    High CourtHeadlines

    Caste-Based Abuse Over Phone Does Not Attract SC/ST Act: Calcutta High Court

    The Calcutta High Court ruled that caste-based abuse made over a phone call does not attract the SC/ST Act. The decision came while hearing Nurul Aras’ anticipatory bail plea under Section 482, seeking protection from FIR charges.

    author
    Supreme Court Orders Ex-Telangana SIB Chief T Prabhakar Rao to Surrender by 11 AM in Phone-Tapping Case
    Supreme Court Orders Ex-Telangana SIB Chief T Prabhakar Rao to Surrender by 11 AM in Phone-Tapping Case
    Supreme Court

    Supreme Court Orders Ex-Telangana SIB Chief T Prabhakar Rao to Surrender by 11 AM in Phone-Tapping Case

    The Supreme Court has directed former Telangana SIB chief T Prabhakar Rao to surrender by 11 am on Friday for further investigation in the phone-tapping case. The court also allowed him home-cooked food and regular medication during custody.

    author
    Rahul Gandhi ‘Hindu’ Remark Case | 'Custodial Interrogation Not Required': Supreme Court Grants Bail to Influencer
    Rahul Gandhi ‘Hindu’ Remark Case | 'Custodial Interrogation Not Required': Supreme Court Grants Bail to Influencer
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Rahul Gandhi ‘Hindu’ Remark Case | ‘Custodial Interrogation Not Required’: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Influencer 

    The Supreme Court has granted anticipatory bail to influencer Raushan Sinha in the Rahul Gandhi ‘Hindu’ remark case, ruling that his arrest was unnecessary and custodial interrogation not required, setting aside the Telangana High Court’s order.

    author
    Madhya Pradesh Court Denies Bail to Doctor Arrested in Tragic Coldrif Cough Syrup Case
    Madhya Pradesh Court Denies Bail to Doctor Arrested in Tragic Coldrif Cough Syrup Case
    Other CourtsLatest news

    Delhi Court Says “No” to Anticipatory Bail for Swami Chaitanyananda Saraswati in Multi-Crore Fraud Case

    Delhi court refuses anticipatory bail to Swami Chaitanyananda Saraswati over serious allegations of fraud, forgery, and misappropriation of funds from Sringeri Peetham. Custodial interrogation deemed necessary to uncover the full chain of alleged criminal acts.

    author
    Dharmasthala Case: Complainant Sent to 14-Day Judicial Custody, Shifted to Shivamogga Jail
    Dharmasthala Case: Complainant Sent to 14-Day Judicial Custody, Shifted to Shivamogga Jail
    Legal updatesLatest news

    Dharmasthala Burial Case | “Skull I Produced Was Not From the Buried Body”: Admits Complainant Witness as SIT Produces Him Before Court

    Dharmasthala mass burial case took a turn when the complainant witness admitted in Belthangady court that the skull he produced was not from the buried body, after which SIT officials immediately took him into custody.

    author