The Centre has approached the Supreme Court challenging a Gujarat High Court ruling that restricted the NCLT President’s power to transfer cases between Benches. It argued that the High Court “wrongly created territorial limits” that are not provided under Rule 16(d) of the NCLT Rules, 2016.
The Mumbai Bench of the NCLT admitted SBI’s application seeking personal insolvency proceedings against Reliance Group Chairman Anil Ambani. The Tribunal appointed a Resolution Professional and directed issuance of a public notice inviting creditor claims, marking a major development in the insolvency process.
The NCLAT ruled that insolvency proceedings against Vatika Limited must be confined to a single real estate project, not the entire company. It emphasized a project-wise CIRP approach to protect homebuyers and unrelated stakeholders despite an established financial default.
Vedanta has approached the Supreme Court seeking a stay on Adani Enterprises’ resolution plan for Jaiprakash Associates. The dispute centers on alleged lack of transparency and rejection of Vedanta’s revised bid in the insolvency process.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, ruled that any person aggrieved by an order of the National Company Law Tribunal may obtain its certified copy to file an appeal, even if they were not a party to the original proceedings.
The Supreme Court of India issued notice and ordered status quo in the dispute arising from the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ruling on the Committee of Creditors of Think and Learn Private Limited (Byju’s).
The Supreme Court of India ruled that National Company Law Tribunal and National Company Law Appellate Tribunal cannot review attachment orders under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, even if linked to Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 proceedings, dismissing liquidators’ appeals.
The Supreme Court recorded Aakash Educational Services Ltd’s undertaking to secure 25.7% stake held by Byju’s parent company till NCLAT decides the dispute. The top court also granted time to Think & Learn Pvt Ltd to subscribe to the second tranche of the Rs 240 crore rights issue.
The Calcutta High Court ruled that the Kolkata Municipal Corporation cannot impose retrospective property tax, revaluation, or municipal dues on auction purchasers in liquidation proceedings. Treating property tax as operational debt under Section 5(21), the Court enforced Section 53.
The Supreme Court of India ruled that telecom companies cannot defer spectrum and licence dues to the Department of Telecommunications, rejecting spectrum as assets. A bench of P. S. Narasimha and Alok Aradhe stressed good, and telecom dues recovery.
