A complaint has been filed in the Kota Consumer Court against Bollywood actor Salman Khan over his pan masala advertisement, alleging that as a role model, he should not promote such products that send a wrong message to the youth.
Consumer court orders SpiceJet to pay Rs 55,000 after serving just one burger and fries during a 14-hour flight delay, citing passenger neglect and poor care.
Consumer Court slams Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar University for 12-year delay in issuing B.Sc. degree; directs payment of Rs. 46,000 to student for mental agony and litigation costs.
Consumer court directs Apple and Croma to refund the iPhone cost, ruling both the manufacturer and the seller jointly liable for the defective product and deficiency in service after complaint by the customer’s heirs.
Air traveller wins ₹2.74 lakh compensation from Consumer Court after airline offered just USD 30 for missing valuables, highlighting passenger rights and airline liability.
Consumer court slams Ola Electric for charging during warranty period; orders Rs. 20,000 compensation for unfair billing practices. “Warranty isn’t just a word,” rules the Commission.
Not even 1% improvement after spending ₹5 lakh. No license, no ethics — just negligence.” Delhi consumer court slaps ₹6.3 lakh penalty on hair transplant clinic after 11-year battle.
The Mumbai Consumer Commission found Flipkart and Thomson TV guilty of selling a defective television and failing to address the customer’s complaints. The commission ruled that both companies are jointly responsible, ordering a full refund of Rs 13,999, compensation for mental distress, and covering litigation costs, collectively amounting to Rs 20,000.
Bengaluru Consumer Court fined a man Rs 40,000 for filing a misleading complaint about a Hyundai car he had already sold and claimed insurance for. The court called his actions a waste of its precious time.
A Bengaluru court ruled that Fala Holidays must refund Rs 1.5 lakh, plus interest and compensation to Hafeez Pasha, misled by a fake lucky draw offer. After persistent pressure to buy a costly membership without service, Pasha sought justice through the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, which found the company guilty of unfair practices.
