Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Plaint Can Be Rejected Only If Limitation Bar Is Clear on Face of Record

The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that a plaint can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC only when it is clearly time-barred from the plaint itself. If limitation depends on disputed facts about when the cause of action arose, the issue must be decided after trial, not at the threshold stage.

Tenant’s Failure To Pay Rent For Five Months Made Compromise Decree Executable: Madhya Pradesh High Court

The Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed a tenant’s plea challenging an executing court order issuing a possession warrant, holding that non-payment of rent for five consecutive months made the compromise decree executable and justified eviction proceedings under applicable tenancy law.

Trademark Battle: Supreme Court Restores Contempt Proceedings Against Hero Ecotech

The Supreme Court of India restored contempt proceedings in the HERO trademark dispute between Hero Cycles Limited and Hero Ecotech Limited, setting aside the Patna High Court order that quashed action under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC.

Transfer Orders Under Section 24 CPC Cannot Be Challenged by Special Appeal: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a Special Appeal is not maintainable against a Single Judge’s order on transfer applications under Section 24 CPC. Such orders are procedural, not “judgments”, and are barred from appeal under Section 105 of the CPC.

Foreign Law Cannot Dissolve Marriage Under Hindu Marriage Act: Gujarat High Court

Gujarat High Court ruled that “Foreign law cannot dissolve marriage under Hindu Marriage Act.” The judgment clarifies that divorces obtained abroad have no legal effect in India for marriages registered under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Proprietorship Is Only a Trade Name, Not a Juristic Person , Can Be Sued but Cannot Sue: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court ruled that a proprietorship is only a trade name and not a juristic person with separate legal status, holding that while such a concern can be sued, it cannot itself initiate legal proceedings.

Centre In Parliament: “No Plans To Change CPC (Civil Procedure Code), National Litigation Policy Not Finalized”

The Union Law Ministry confirmed that no changes are planned for the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). The BJP’s 2024 manifesto promised major reforms in civil and commercial justice to speed up cases and reduce legal burdens. The government also stated that the National Litigation Policy is yet to be finalized. Key legal reforms like ADR, arbitration, and mediation laws are being strengthened to cut delays and improve efficiency in India’s legal system.

JUSTICE CT RAVIKUMAR

Justice CT Ravikumar, born on January 6, 1960, became a Supreme Court Judge on August 31, 2021, after over two decades in legal practice. Notably, he authored 39 judgments and emphasized child welfare in custody cases and clarified legal procedural amendments. His retirement is set for January 5, 2025.

Dispute Over British-Era Shanan Hydropower Project: SC to Hear HP’s Plea Against Maintainability of Punjab’s Suit on Nov 8

The Himachal Pradesh government is challenging the Punjab government’s lawsuit regarding control of the Shanan Hydropower Project, which arose after a 99-year lease expired. The Supreme Court will address the maintainability of this suit on November 8, with Himachal Pradesh arguing that Punjab lacks valid cause of action.