Supreme Court: Plaint Amendment Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC Allowed Where Facts Have Direct Nexus

Order VI Rule 17 CPC allows a plaint to be amended where the added facts and consequential reliefs have a direct nexus with the existing controversy, the Supreme Court has held, adding that a wider dispute does not by itself change the nature of the suit. New Delhi: Setting aside concurrent orders of the trial […]

Daughters Cannot Claim Rights In Agricultural Land If Succession Opened Before 2005 Amendment: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court held that daughters cannot claim inheritance or partition rights in agricultural land where succession opened before the 2005 Hindu Succession Act amendment, ruling that such cases remain governed by the Delhi Land Reforms Act, under which male lineal descendants receive preference in succession.

Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Plaint Can Be Rejected Only If Limitation Bar Is Clear on Face of Record

The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that a plaint can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC only when it is clearly time-barred from the plaint itself. If limitation depends on disputed facts about when the cause of action arose, the issue must be decided after trial, not at the threshold stage.

Tenant’s Failure To Pay Rent For Five Months Made Compromise Decree Executable: Madhya Pradesh High Court

The Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed a tenant’s plea challenging an executing court order issuing a possession warrant, holding that non-payment of rent for five consecutive months made the compromise decree executable and justified eviction proceedings under applicable tenancy law.

Trademark Battle: Supreme Court Restores Contempt Proceedings Against Hero Ecotech

The Supreme Court of India restored contempt proceedings in the HERO trademark dispute between Hero Cycles Limited and Hero Ecotech Limited, setting aside the Patna High Court order that quashed action under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC.

Transfer Orders Under Section 24 CPC Cannot Be Challenged by Special Appeal: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a Special Appeal is not maintainable against a Single Judge’s order on transfer applications under Section 24 CPC. Such orders are procedural, not “judgments”, and are barred from appeal under Section 105 of the CPC.

Foreign Law Cannot Dissolve Marriage Under Hindu Marriage Act: Gujarat High Court

Gujarat High Court ruled that “Foreign law cannot dissolve marriage under Hindu Marriage Act.” The judgment clarifies that divorces obtained abroad have no legal effect in India for marriages registered under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Proprietorship Is Only a Trade Name, Not a Juristic Person , Can Be Sued but Cannot Sue: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court ruled that a proprietorship is only a trade name and not a juristic person with separate legal status, holding that while such a concern can be sued, it cannot itself initiate legal proceedings.

Centre In Parliament: “No Plans To Change CPC (Civil Procedure Code), National Litigation Policy Not Finalized”

The Union Law Ministry confirmed that no changes are planned for the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). The BJP’s 2024 manifesto promised major reforms in civil and commercial justice to speed up cases and reduce legal burdens. The government also stated that the National Litigation Policy is yet to be finalized. Key legal reforms like ADR, arbitration, and mediation laws are being strengthened to cut delays and improve efficiency in India’s legal system.