The Supreme Court has entertained Sanjay Raut’s petition in the INDIA bloc SIR challenge only provisionally, subject to him explaining his conduct over remarks on the CJI and judges. The allegations are untested and the Court has expressed no view on the merits.
Justice V Kameswar Rao was sworn in as Chief Justice of the Patna High Court on September 13, 2026, ending a two-month spell under an acting Chief Justice. He is the fourth permanent Chief Justice the court has had in a year, and is due to retire in August 2027.
The Supreme Court sought a status report from the Delhi Police on the alleged assault of a Supreme Court advocate by his neighbours. It directed a Deputy Commissioner-level officer to submit details of the investigation and action on the victim’s threat complaint.
The Supreme Court directed the Uttar Pradesh SIT to submit a status report on the alleged Ram Mandir donation theft and misappropriation case. It also issued notice to the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust, seeking its response to the petitions.
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant said that artificial intelligence is no longer a speculative technology but a functioning reality, posing one of the biggest challenges to international law. He stressed that decisions made this decade will shape technology, power, freedom, and justice.
CJI Surya Kant praised retiring Supreme Court Judges J. K. Maheshwari and Pankaj Mithal, calling their service dignified and value-driven. He said they showed that authority need not create distance and thanked them for years of dedicated service.
Today, On 29th May, The Delhi High Court refused to order the immediate restoration of the Cockroach Janata Party’s X account, noting that some posts appeared slightly offensive. The bench said the matter required a holistic consideration after hearing the government and the platform.
The Delhi High Court will hear a petition by Abhijeet Dipke, founder of the satirical Cockroach Janta Party, challenging the blocking of the group’s X account. He argues the action violates free speech and suppresses political satire online.
As Delhi’s temperature neared 50°C, the Supreme Court urged lawyers to join hearings virtually to avoid the extreme heat. It encouraged online appearances but stopped short of mandating them, noting potential accessibility issues for many practitioners in India.
The Supreme Court refused to grant an urgent hearing to a PIL that sought strict and effective enforcement of the law banning cow slaughter ahead of Bakrid, directing the petitioner to follow the regular listing process.
