The Rajasthan High Court has upheld a trial court’s decision to allow a bank cheque-return memo, first exhibited without the bank’s seal and signature, to be produced again with them and marked afresh, in a cheque-dishonour case under the Negotiable Instruments Act. Marking a document as an exhibit, the Court held, does not by itself prove its contents or authenticity; that must still be established at trial, where the accused can test it in cross-examination.
The Supreme Court gave actor Rajpal Yadav a last opportunity to return with a concrete proposal, including a draft of at least Rs 2 crore, in cases arising from the dishonour of seven cheques. His counsel sought two weeks, citing property that would be sold to raise the money. The Bench listed the matter for October 5.
The Delhi High Court sentenced actor Rajpal Yadav to three months’ simple imprisonment in seven cheque bounce cases for repeatedly breaching settlement undertakings. The Court also directed him to pay Rs 7.35 crore in compensation, while his wife was fined over Rs 5 lakh in each case.
The Karnataka High Court ruled that prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot continue against a former director when a cheque was issued after the company’s dissolution. The Court held that a dissolved company lacks legal existence, making such cheques legally unenforceable.
The Delhi High Court refused to grant more time to actor Rajpal Yadav to pay Rs 6 crore in a cheque bounce case and reserved its judgment. The Court criticised his changing stance on payment and warned against seeking judicial leniency out of weakness.
The Delhi High Court refused to cancel Rajpal Yadav’s sentence suspension, saying there is no risk of him absconding. The Court stressed that he remains an “ordinary litigant” and will decide the case finally on April 1.
The Delhi High Court questioned Rajpal Yadav’s failure to comply with his own financial commitments while hearing his bail plea in a cheque bounce case. The Court has adjourned the matter to Monday and directed the other side to file a reply.
Actor Rajpal Yadav surrendered before Tihar Jail authorities after the Delhi High Court refused to extend the deadline in multiple cheque bounce cases. The court said no special treatment can be given and cited repeated non-compliance with payment undertakings.
The Delhi High Court rejected actor Rajpal Yadav’s final plea to avoid imprisonment in a cheque bounce case, refusing to hear him unless he surrendered first. Following the court’s order, Yadav told the bench he would surrender before Tihar Jail authorities later today.
The Delhi High Court refused to grant more time to actor Rajpal Yadav and directed him to surrender by 4 PM in a cheque bounce case. The Court said there was “no ground to show leniency” after repeated failures to honour payment assurances.
