“Paper apology”: that is how the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court described the unconditional apologies of a father and son, both advocates, as it found Two Lawyers Guilty Of Contempt for shouting at a Judicial Magistrate and threatening him in open court. Nagpur: Advocates Sagar Durgadas Rathod and his father Durgadas D Rathod […]
The Bombay High Court has observed a rising trend of advocates wilfully disregarding court orders and escaping with an apology, and has asked the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa to take stern action against such advocates.
The Supreme Court has clarified that an advocate who only attests or identifies a deponent in an affidavit is not responsible for its truthfulness. The Court slammed the Bar Council for malicious proceedings and imposed Rs 50,000 costs each on the complainant and BCMG.
Today, On 24th September, The Supreme Court imposed a Rs 50,000 fine on the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa for pursuing a baseless complaint against an advocate. The judgment emphasizes accountability and discourages frivolous legal actions by regulatory bodies.
In a fake court fee scam, Advocate Ranjeeta Vengurlekar was suspended from legal practice for two years by the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa for fraudulently charging a client Rs.80,000 as court fees.
Justice A.S. Oka stressed that judges must not think about future career opportunities after taking the oath. He said such thoughts weaken their ability to perform judicial duties with honesty, independence, and integrity.
At his farewell event in Pune, former Supreme Court judge Abhay Oka said judges should take up more matters to reduce case pendency, adding that simply creating another bench won’t solve the backlog problem in courts.
The Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa condemned senior state officials for failing to welcome Chief Justice of India BR Gavai during his visit. They passed a resolution demanding immediate action against those responsible for the protocol breach and called for an inquiry into security denials faced by its members at the airport.
Vice President Dhankhar reacted to CJI Gavai’s concerns over protocol issues, saying, “I am also a sufferer.” He emphasized that following protocol is not about personal status but about respecting constitutional institutions and traditions.
CJI B.R. Gavai expressed strong displeasure over a protocol lapse during his first visit to Maharashtra after taking charge, stating, “If it were someone else, Article 142 would have been invoked immediately.”
